Clinical Outcomes and Quality Of Life After Minimally Invasive Segmentectomy Versus Lobectomy for Lung Cancer.

The goal is to compare patient reported outcomes, such as dyspnea, physical functioning and quality of life, between minimally invasive segmentectomy and lobectomy for stage I NSCLC during the first year after surgery. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Do patients with stage I NSCLC that undergo minimally invasive segmentectomy have less postoperative dyspnea than patients that undergo lobectomy? * Do patients with stage I NSCLC that undergo minimally invasive segmentectomy have more favorable postoperative health related quality of life (HRQoL) than patients that undergo lobectomy? * Do patients with stage I NSCLC that undergo VATS segmentectomy or lobectomy have more favorable postoperative health related quality of life (HRQoL) than patients that undergo RATS segmentectomy or lobectomy? Participants already undergoing surgical intervention as part of their regular medical care for resectable lung cancer will answer quality of life questionnaires preoperatively, at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery.