Class II Malocclusion Clinical Trials

7 recruiting

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Class II Malocclusion clinical trials

A clinical trial is a carefully designed research study that tests new medical treatments, drugs, devices, or approaches in human volunteers. Every approved medication and treatment available today was proven safe and effective through clinical trials.

All clinical trials are reviewed and approved by Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) — independent committees that evaluate patient safety. Trials follow strict protocols, and your health is monitored closely throughout. You can withdraw at any time.

Not necessarily. Many trials compare the new treatment against the current standard of care, meaning all participants receive active treatment. When placebos are used, they are typically combined with standard treatment, not given alone. The trial description will always specify the design.

Under the Affordable Care Act, most private insurers are required to cover routine patient care costs during a clinical trial. The sponsor typically covers the investigational treatment itself. Medicare also covers routine costs for qualifying trials.

Yes. Participation is completely voluntary. You can withdraw at any time, for any reason, without it affecting your access to standard medical care.

Each trial has specific eligibility criteria — including age, diagnosis, disease stage, prior treatments, and general health. Browse the trials listed above and check their eligibility sections. You can also contact the trial site directly to discuss your situation.

Showing 18 of 8 trials

Recruiting
Not Applicable

"Sliding Jigs vs Retraction Hooks for Maxillary Dentition Distalization Using IZC Miniscrews"

Skeletal Class II Malocclusion
Sana'a University40 enrolled1 locationNCT07307209
Recruiting
Not Applicable

Ready-made vs. Custom-made Carriere Motion Appliance

Class II Malocclusion
Mansoura University24 enrolled1 locationNCT07361172
Recruiting
Not Applicable

Dentoskeletal Effects of 3D-Printed Fixed Twin Block Versus MARA Appliances in Management of Skeletal Class II

Class II MalocclusionMandibular Deficiency
Mansoura University60 enrolled1 locationNCT07340242
Recruiting
Not Applicable

Treatment of Mild Class II Malocclusion in Adult Patients With Clear Aligners Versus Fixed Multibracket Therapy

Class II MalocclusionMalocclusion
Hama University24 enrolled1 locationNCT05684510
Recruiting
Not Applicable

Comparison of Distalization of Maxillary First and Second Molars Between a Miniscrew Implant Supported Device and Clear Aligners.

Class II MalocclusionDistalization by MiniscrewsDistalization+1 more
Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki40 enrolled1 locationNCT07040176
Recruiting
Not Applicable

Microbial Adherence, Surface Roughness, Effectiveness and Impact on Patients Between Conventional and 3D Printed Twin Block Appliances

Orthodontic Appliance ComplicationOrthodontic Appliances, RemovableClass II Malocclusion, Division 1
University of Malaya32 enrolled1 locationNCT06944860
Recruiting
Not Applicable

Maxillary Segmental Distalization Using Digitally Printed Appliances

Class II Malocclusion
Mansoura University40 enrolled1 locationNCT06511219
Recruiting
Not Applicable

Invisalign® System with Mandibular Advancement

Class II MalocclusionMandibular AdvancementMandibular Retrognathism+1 more
Align Technology, Inc.36 enrolled3 locationsNCT06651944