An evaluation of the clinical outcomes of the subvastus versus the medial parapatella approach to total knee replacement
An evaluation of the clinical outcomes (American Knee Society Score, Knee Range of Motion, Quadriceps Function, Functional Mobility, Pain, Patella Vascularity) of the subvastus versus the medial parapatella approach to total knee replacement
Queensland Health
64 participants
Jul 14, 2006
Interventional
Conditions
Summary
Study Hypothesis: We hypothesise that participants receiving the subvastus approach will enjoy better medium term funtional outcomes than those receiving the medial parapatell approach. Physiotherapists are blinded to the intervention and will collect all outcome measures at each assessment point. Participants are blinded to the intervention.
Eligibility
Plain Language Summary
Simplified for easier understanding
This summary was AI-generated to explain the trial in plain language. It is not medical advice. Always discuss eligibility with your doctor before enrolling in a clinical trial.
Interested in this trial?
Get notified about updates and connect with the research team.
Interventions
Medial Parapatella approach to Total Knee Replacement involves dissection through the quadriceps. The Subvastus approach does not. Assessments will be performed at PreOperative Period, Days 1,2,3; 6 Weeks, 6 months, 12 months and 18 months post operatively
Locations(1)
View Full Details on ANZCTR
For the most up-to-date information, visit the official listing.
ACTRN12606000376549