A comparison of fentanyl with pethidine for pain relief during childbirth.
Obstetric analgesia: A comparison of intranasal or subcutaneously administered fentanyl with intramuscular administered pethidine in labour and its effects on mother and baby.
Flinders University
150 participants
May 1, 2010
Interventional
Conditions
Summary
Pethidine is currently the most widely used narcotic administered systemically for the relief of labour pain, but has been shown to have numerous side effects on both mother and neonate. An alternative narcotic, fentanyl when administered intravenously (IV) has been shown to have fewer side effects and a shorter duration of action than does pethidine. There is a lack of research relating to the use of fentanyl administered during labour via alternative routes. Alternative routes have the benefit of being less invasive, requires fewer resources and provides more autonomy to the midwife providing care. This has particular benefits for rural and remote birthing communities. This study will examine the safety and efficacy of fentanyl administered by intranasal (IN) or subcutaneous (s.c) routes for pain relief during childbirth for both mother and neonate. It also will investigate possible maternal and neonatal side effects. Outcomes will be compared with intramuscular (IM) pethidine.
Eligibility
Plain Language Summary
Simplified for easier understanding
This summary was AI-generated to explain the trial in plain language. It is not medical advice. Always discuss eligibility with your doctor before enrolling in a clinical trial.
Interested in this trial?
Get notified about updates and connect with the research team.
Interventions
Participants will be randomised into one of three groups. Group 1. Self administered intranasal fentanyl, under supervision of a midwife. Group 2. Fentanyl administered subcutaneously Group 3. Pethidine administered intramuscularly
Locations(1)
View Full Details on ANZCTR
For the most up-to-date information, visit the official listing.
ACTRN12609001027202