CompletedPhase 4ACTRN12610000063011

A Comparison of Liver Function After Hepatectomy in Cirrhotic Patients Between Isoflurane Inhaled and Propofol Intravenous in Anesthesia with Epidural Block

A prospective randomized controlled trial to compare postoperative liver functions, cytokines and complications between isoflurane inhaled and propofol intravenous anesthesia in cirrhotic patients undergoing hepatectomy for hepatic carcinoma


Sponsor

Shanghai Rising-Star Program (No 08QA14007)

Enrollment

60 participants

Start Date

Dec 1, 2008

Study Type

Interventional

Conditions

Summary

Liver resection may require hepatic inflow occlusion (Pringle’s maneuver) to diminish intraoperative blood loss, thus may result in transient ischemia followed by reperfusion, which may initiate liver injury and lead to postoperative liver dysfunction. Many protective strategies against ischemia reperfusion (IR) injury in the liver have been proposed, including surgical interventions, use of pharmacologic agents, or gene therapy, however, none of these methods has found its way into routine clinical practice. Therefore, therapeutic strategies to prevent liver tissue damage after IR have become the focus of extensive research efforts. Recently, accumulating evidence suggests volatile anesthetics can attenuate liver IR injury through a mechanism of inducing some endogenous protective molecules such as heme-oxygenase (HO) enzyme system or hypoxia induced factor (HIF) etc, which suggest volatile anesthetics concerning pharmacological pretreatment would most likely be a hopeful way to prolonger the patient’s endurance to hepatic IR. Unfortunately, most of isoflurane hepatoprotection evidences and related mechanisms were based on the result of animal studies, as isoflurane are most clinically used anesthetic during liver resection worldwide. Since Pringle’s maneuver are commonly applied by most of surgeons in our center which also cause an inevitable liver damage perioperatively, therefore providing us an ideal clinic model of hepatic IR injury. In order to test our hypothesis that using volatile anesthetics isoflurane can attenuate live IR injury rather than intravenous propofol in hepatectomy patients. We designed this clinical randomized comparative study to observer hepatectomy patients’ postoperative outcome especially liver function recovery when they received isofluare inhaled anesthesia or propofol injection respectively. We also compared serum proinflammatory factor and liver histiopathologic changes between 2 groups.


Eligibility

Sex: Both males and femalesMin Age: 18 YearssMax Age: 80 Yearss

Plain Language Summary

Simplified for easier understanding

This study compares two types of anesthesia (inhaled isoflurane vs. intravenous propofol) during liver surgery to see which is gentler on liver function in patients who have liver cirrhosis from hepatitis B. It is for adults aged 18 to 80 undergoing planned liver removal.

This summary was AI-generated to explain the trial in plain language. It is not medical advice. Always discuss eligibility with your doctor before enrolling in a clinical trial.

Interested in this trial?

Get notified about updates and connect with the research team.

Interventions

a) 1-1.5 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of isoflurane 1.15-1.75 % , the individual patient's dose is based on the clinical variables; b) anaesthic administered from 30 minutes before commenceme

a) 1-1.5 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of isoflurane 1.15-1.75 % , the individual patient's dose is based on the clinical variables; b) anaesthic administered from 30 minutes before commencement of surgery until completion of surgery (100-200 minutes in total) c) the mode of administration: inhalation via tracheal tubing.


Locations(1)

Shanghai, China

View Full Details on ANZCTR

For the most up-to-date information, visit the official listing.

Visit

ACTRN12610000063011