Efficacy of N-Alpha Methyl Histamine versus Propranolol in prevention of miigraine.
Efficacy of N alpha Methyl histamine versus propranolol in migraine prophylaxis
Hospital General deZona 1 Intituto Mexicano del Seguro Social
60 participants
Mar 2, 2010
Interventional
Conditions
Summary
N alpha methyl histamine, possesses a greater affinity for H3 receptors, and could constitute a new therapeutic drug in migraine prophylaxis. OBJETIVE. To compare the superior efficacy of the subcutaneous administration of N alpha-methyl histamine versus oral propranolol in migraine prophylaxis, undertaking double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Hypothesis That subcutaneously injected N alpha methyl histamine (1-3ug) is more effective than propranolol (120mg/ day) in migraine prophylaxis. Null Hypothesis There is no difference between the subcutaneous administration of N- alpha methyl histamine in doses of 1-3 ng and oral propanolol as prophylactic agents against migraine METHODS. A randomized, double–blind study in 60 patients with migraine, male or female adults between the ages of 18 and 65 years. Selected patients will undergo a one-month period of prophylactic agent washout, they will then be divided into two groups for treatment in randomized blocks of three, double-blind fashion: N-alpha metyl histamine study group (n=30) and the propranolol control group (n=30). The treatment will consist of subcutaneous (back region of the upper arm) administration of N alpha methyl histamine twice a week, plus an oral placebo for a period of twelve weeks. Therapy with propranolol will begin at 40 mg/day for one week; until a total daily dose of 120 mg/day for a period of twelve weeks; plus a subcutaneous placebo. The variables we will study are: headache frequency; intensity of pain; duration of pain; intake of rescue analgesics and MIDAS. Statistical Analysis: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population will include all randomized patients. Two-tailed Student’s t test. Mann-Whitney U rank sum test. In order to analyze the temporal course of each treatment, a Friedman repeated measures ANOVA on ranks test will be used to evaluate the statistical significance of differences between basal values and values found for the 4th, 8th, and 12th weeks of treatment. This study has been approved by the Ethical and Scientific Committee of our hospital.
Eligibility
Plain Language Summary
Simplified for easier understanding
This summary was AI-generated to explain the trial in plain language. It is not medical advice. Always discuss eligibility with your doctor before enrolling in a clinical trial.
Interested in this trial?
Get notified about updates and connect with the research team.
Interventions
a) Name of the treatment: N alpha methyl histamine in Evan’s solution (phenol 0.4%, isotonic sodium chloride) (10 ug/ml) b) Dose administered 0.1 ml c) Frequency and duration administered: twice a week for 12 weeks d) Mode of administration: subcutaneous injection into back region of the upper arm. The number of treatment/control arms in this trial. Arm 1: N alpha methyl histamine + placebo propanolol Arm 2: placebo N alpha methyl histamine + propanolol
Locations(1)
View Full Details on ANZCTR
For the most up-to-date information, visit the official listing.
ACTRN12610000126011