A comparative study of the ease-of use of the Encode technique versus conventional dental implant impression systems.
A comparative study of the ease-of-use of the Encode technique versus conventional implant impression systems for simple, single-tooth dental implant cases.
University Of Melbourne
50 participants
Jun 1, 2011
Interventional
Conditions
Summary
The purpose of this study is to find out if the Encode implant restoration system allows for faster and simpler treatment compared to traditional implant restoration systems. the Encode system uses computerised scanning of the dental impression and does not require the use of impression copings.
Eligibility
Plain Language Summary
Simplified for easier understanding
This is a simplified summary. Always discuss eligibility with your doctor before enrolling in a clinical trial.
Interested in this trial?
Get notified about updates and connect with the research team.
Interventions
The Encode system will be used at the time of implant restoration. This system does not involve the removal of the healing abutment or placement of an impression coping. An impression of the healing abutment is taken which is then scanned at the laboratory. Patients attend for 5 standard treatment visits (over a 6 month period) plus 2 further review appointments at yearly intervals (standard procedure).
Locations(1)
View Full Details on ANZCTR
For the most up-to-date information, visit the official listing.
ACTRN12611000578909