CompletedPhase 2ACTRN12612000216819

Botulinum Toxin A (BTXA) versus Hydrodistension for Refractory Interstitial Cystitis/Painful Bladder Syndrome (IC/PBS)- a Multicentre, Prospective, Randomized, Double Blind Study


Sponsor

John Hunter Hospital

Enrollment

50 participants

Start Date

Jan 1, 2004

Study Type

Interventional

Conditions

Summary

Background IC/PBS requires effective treatment options. Objective Is BTXA effective for the treatment of IC/PBS? Design, Setting and Participants: 2003-2009, 55 severe, refractory female subjects from 3 referral centres invited. UTI, malignancy, steroid use excluded. Intervention Double blind design, random allocation to treatment with hydrodistension and bladder wall injection of normal saline, or else hydrodistension with injection of BTXA. Outcome measures and statistical Analysis O’Leary Sant (OLS) problem (PI) and Symptom (SI), UIIQ, compared between BTXA and controls. Repeated measures ANOVA tested whether BTXA subjects performed better than control subjects (group effect) for changes from baseline to 3 months (time effect) by assessing significance of group by time interaction. Multivariate modelling analyzed effect over time of other possible confounders. Measurements made beyond 3 months, but no further randomized comparisons possible, as majority subjects then chose active BTXA injection. Withdrawal; 4 subjects completed questionnaires too poorly, 1 withdrawn pre treatment with bladder cancer, leaving 50. Results and limitations: In both groups, the OLS, bladder diary, UIIQ scores showed improvement over 3 months. But no difference detected during initial analysis between the BTXA and control subjects for any outcome measure except OLS PI, where improvement noted at 3 months (P=0.04). 12 had UTI treated during the study. This significantly confounded, with greater improvement seen in the control group treated for UTI. Multivariate modelling accounted for effect of UTI showing improvement in the total OLS score (P=0.02), the OLS SI for the BTXA (P=0.008) group, pain (Q4 of OLS PI) (P=0.015) for the BTXA group at 3 months. 24% request continuing periodic BTXA treatment. Conclusions BTXA treatment improves OLS score at 3 months when compared to hydrodistension and saline injection alone, for a minority women. Consideration of the significant confounding effect of UTI, strengthened this improvement.


Eligibility

Sex: FemalesMin Age: 18 YearssMax Age: 100 Yearss

Plain Language Summary

Simplified for easier understanding

This double-blind trial compares Botulinum Toxin A injections versus bladder hydrodistension (stretching the bladder with fluid) for treating women with chronic interstitial cystitis or painful bladder syndrome that has not responded to other treatments. Female participants aged 18-100 are eligible if they have refractory symptoms. The study measures which treatment provides better pain relief and bladder function improvement.

This summary was AI-generated to explain the trial in plain language. It is not medical advice. Always discuss eligibility with your doctor before enrolling in a clinical trial.

Interested in this trial?

Get notified about updates and connect with the research team.

Interventions

Injection of Botulinum A toxin; Dysport 500U diluted in 30 mls of saline and injected into the bladder wall, submucosally. It occurs once. Hydrodistension involves stretching the bladder with infusd

Injection of Botulinum A toxin; Dysport 500U diluted in 30 mls of saline and injected into the bladder wall, submucosally. It occurs once. Hydrodistension involves stretching the bladder with infusd saline using 120 cm of hydrostatic pressure for 4 minutes .


Locations(1)

Australia

View Full Details on ANZCTR

For the most up-to-date information, visit the official listing.

Visit

ACTRN12612000216819