Effect of Local Warming versus Local Cooling on Injection Pain After Propofol Administration During Anaesthesia Induction
Effect of Local Warming versus Local Cooling on Injection Pain After Propofol Administration During Anaesthesia Induction in those Scheduled for Elective Surgery
Serdar Koseoglu
114 participants
Sep 1, 2011
Interventional
Conditions
Summary
Purpose: Various drugs and techniques have been proposed in order to prevent propofol induced pain. Local warming or warming of propofol has been reported to be effective in reducing the pain but local cooling has not been studied yet. In this study we aimed to investigate the effect of local warming and cooling on pain induced by propofol. Materials and methods: One hundred and twenty patients undergoing elective surgery were included in this randomized, prospective, single-blinded study. Patients were divided into 3 equal groups. In Group I; warming at + 40 degrees C applied for 2 min prior to propofol administration at the site venous access, in Group II; cooling at + 4 degrees C was applied for 2 min prior to propofol administration at the site venous access. In Group III (Control); no intervention was applied. In each patient, propofol was injected over a period of 1 min at a dose of 2,5 mg/kg. Patients were asked about any discomfort at the 15th seconds of injection. Findings observed until the injection finished and the response was recorded according to the 5-point scale. Results: Demographic data were comparable between groups. The frequency of pain at propofol injection was lower in Group I (47.5%) compared to Group II (77.5%) and III (82.5%) (p= 0.006),( p = <0,001) The frequency of pain did not differ statistically between Group II and III. Conclusions: Application of local warming prior to propofol administration effectively decreased the pain induced by propofol, whereas local cooling had no impact.
Eligibility
Inclusion Criteria1
- ASA groups I and III, and who were scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia
Exclusion Criteria1
- Being pregnant and breastfeeding women, having a medical history of epilepsy, having cardiac conduction failure,having lipid metabolism disorder, receiving antiarrhytmic or analgesic drugs, having liver or kidney failure, being allergic to propofol and difficulty for iv cannulation.
Interested in this trial?
Get notified about updates and connect with the research team.
Interventions
After obtaining local research ethical committee approval and patients’ informed written consent, 120 patients were studied between age groups of 18 and 65 years old, of ASA groups I and III, and who were scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia . The exclusion criteria were; being pregnant and breastfeeding women, having a medical history of epilepsy, having cardiac conduction failure,having lipid metabolism disorder, receiving antiarrhytmic or analgesic drugs, having liver or kidney failure, being allergic to propofol and difficulty for iv cannulation. Without any premedication, the patients were given, 5 ml/kg/hour crystalloid solution, through a 20 G iv cannule which is attached on the dorsum of the hand. Patients in the operation room were monitored for; standard electrocardiography (ECG), blood pressure non invasively and peripheral oxygen saturation (Drager;Infinity delta MS13466E539D,USA). The patients were randomly allocated, using sealed envelopes, to one of following 3 groups of 40 each: 1. Local warming group , (Group I): Before anesthesia induction patients were subjected to 40 degrees C hot application for 2 minutes with a bair hugger device (a device blowing hot air through a blanket to be worn over the body), through the vein trace which the cannula were attached. 2. Local cooling group (Group II): Before anesthesia induction patients were subjected to +2-4 degrees C cooling application for 2 minutes with cold water bags kept in refrigerator, through the infusion vein trace. 3. No intervention group (Group III): Patients in this group were accepted as control group and were not subjected to any procedure. Propofol prepared in room temperature (10 mg/ml ampoule, Fresenius) were administered as 2,5 mg/kg dose and within one minute to all groups. On the 15th second with the start of injection, the patients were asked about suffering any pain. Findings observed until the injection finished and the response was recorded according to the 5-point Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) (0= no pain, 1= mild pain, 2= moderate pain, 3= severe pain, 4= severe pain accompanied by facial grimacing and arm withdrawal).. After propofol injection, opioid and muscle relaxant (only for patients who will be intubated) were given Then the operation progressed with an intubation or a laryngeal mask. Hemodynamics were measured and recorded at control (T0), 1.(T1), 2.(T2), 3.(T3) minutes.
Locations(1)
View Full Details on ANZCTR
For the most up-to-date information, visit the official listing.
ACTRN12612000435886