Comparison of Ultrasound Guided Saphenous Nerve Block using Two Different Anatomical Approaches in patients undergoing knee surgery
Comparison of the analgesic efficacy and onset time of the ultrasound-guided saphenous nerve block using two different anatomical approach that one of them is subsartorial and the other is level of medial condylar, addition to sciatic nerve block in all patients undergoing knee surgery.
Levent Sahin
60 participants
Jan 31, 2014
Interventional
Conditions
Summary
The present study was designed to compare and evaluate to applicable the ultrasound guided saphenous nerve blocks which are supsartorial approach and medial condyl approach, and measure to onset time, block duration time, patient satisfaction. Sixty patients between 18 to 60 years of age undergoing sub-knee surgery were randomized to two groups. Intervention(s): Saphenous nerve block performs using the ultrasound-guided technique with 5 mL 0.25 % levobupivacaine+ %1 lidocaine with either subsartorial tecnique or medial condyl tecnique. Main outcome measures: Blocks duration time, block onset time and patient satisfaction over the course of 24 hours.
Eligibility
Inclusion Criteria1
- American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) class I-III patients who were scheduled for sub-knee surgery
Exclusion Criteria1
- Psychiatric illness, Diabetes mellitus, any organ failure and known hypersensitivity to relevant drugs.
Interested in this trial?
Get notified about updates and connect with the research team.
Interventions
We apply Ultrasound guided saphenous nerve block at level of medial condyl with 5 mL % 0.25 levobupivacaine + % 1 lidocaine for intraoperative anaesthesia management undergoing sub-knee surgery
Locations(1)
View Full Details on ANZCTR
For the most up-to-date information, visit the official listing.
ACTRN12614000057684