Comparison of the Macintosh laryngoscope vs KingVision videolaryngoscope for routine tracheal intubation
Comparison of the Macintosh laryngoscope vs KingVision videolaryngoscope for routine tracheal intubation in Asian female surgical patients without predictors of difficult airway
Dr Wendy H.L. Teoh
60 participants
Jun 10, 2014
Interventional
Conditions
Summary
This trial compares intubation times and characteristics of using conventional direct Macintosh laryngoscopy vs. the novel KingVision videolaryngoscope to intubate the tracheas of 60 patients with normal airways.
Eligibility
Plain Language Summary
Simplified for easier understanding
This is a simplified summary. Always discuss eligibility with your doctor before enrolling in a clinical trial.
Interested in this trial?
Get notified about updates and connect with the research team.
Interventions
After induction of a standard general anaesthetic and 3 min after administration of a neuromuscular blocking agent, patients underwent indirect laryngoscopy and intubation with the KingVision videolaryngoscope (comprising a reusable 2.4inch video display screen and disposable blades).
Locations(1)
View Full Details on ANZCTR
For the most up-to-date information, visit the official listing.
ACTRN12614000609651