RecruitingACTRN12619001007123

What is the effect of a shared leadership system for maternity emergency teams on team performance ?


Sponsor

Monash University

Enrollment

24 participants

Start Date

Jul 19, 2019

Study Type

Interventional

Conditions

Summary

Traditionally during maternity emergencies, it is recommended that a single leader take charge. However, in many critical circumstances there may be too many things for a single leader to do. This project aims to test a system where the leadership tasks can be shared between two leaders to determine if this is superior to a singular leadership model.


Eligibility

Sex: Both males and femalesMin Age: 18 YearssMax Age: 80 Yearss

Plain Language Summary

Simplified for easier understanding

During childbirth emergencies, the traditional approach is for a single leader to take charge and coordinate the team. However, in fast-moving or complex situations, one leader may struggle to handle everything effectively. This study tests whether sharing leadership responsibilities between two people during maternity emergencies results in better team performance. The study takes place as part of a training course called the Maternity Emergency Management (MEM) course. Doctors and midwives attending the course are invited to participate in simulation scenarios where teams operate under either the traditional single-leader model or a shared-leadership model. Their performance is then measured and compared. You may be eligible if you are a doctor or midwife attending the Maternity Emergency Management course and you consent to participate. There are no other restrictions based on medical history.

This summary was AI-generated to explain the trial in plain language. It is not medical advice. Always discuss eligibility with your doctor before enrolling in a clinical trial.

Interested in this trial?

Get notified about updates and connect with the research team.

Interventions

The developed system of shared leadership (dual leadership) will be compared to traditional vertical leadership in a simulated maternity emergency using a comparative trial with a counterbalanced, c

The developed system of shared leadership (dual leadership) will be compared to traditional vertical leadership in a simulated maternity emergency using a comparative trial with a counterbalanced, crossover design. Participants will be attendees (midwives, midwifery students, obstetric doctors and anaesthetic doctors) at the simulation training course “Maternity Emergency Management” (MEM). The course is delivered by an interprofessional team of clinician educators (midwifery/obstetrics and anaesthetics) with training in simulation delivery and debriefing. The setting is a simulation centre which is co-located with a tertiary maternity hospital. Up to 14 participants per course will be divided into two teams who will participate in 2 research scenarios each during the MEM course day. ( research scenarios will be 2&5 (one team) and 3&6 (second team)). The research scenarios are a fully immersive simulation scenario with a high-fidelity human mannequin. Each intact team of 6-7 participants will be called to an emergency and be expected to assess and manage the "patient" as they would in real life. These scenarios will be similar in the diagnostic approach and management required by the team. Teams will be trained in the use of a cognitive aid during non-research scenarios (scenarios 1&4) to enable singular or shared leadership to be practiced prior to participation in the scenario ustilising the respective leadership structure. Non-research scenarios are immersive scenarios in the "rapid cycle deliberate practice style". Teams will "tag in" and "tag out" of caring for the patient. All scenarios will happen in the course of one day with each team participating in the non-research scenarios and 2 research scenarios each. Non-research scenarios last 30-45 minutes, Research scenarios last 5-10 minutes and are followed by a 20-40 minute debriefing. Teamwork scores (primary outcome) for shared and singular leadership will be compared within groups. Teamwork scores will be assessed during the emergency phase (that is the time after the emergency alarm is activated). The leadership type and scenario order will be counterbalanced to reduce the impact of the learning curve through the day. A latin Square will be used to ensure counterbalancing and the order of the implementation of the course each day will be determined by a randomisation.


Locations(1)

QLD, Australia

View Full Details on ANZCTR

For the most up-to-date information, visit the official listing.

Visit

ACTRN12619001007123