PROMPT: PROcedural sedation vs Methoxyflurane a Prospective cohorT Study.
Prospective randomised double arm study comparing safety, pain and anxiety outcomes between methoxyflurane vs intravenous fentanyl and midazolam for patients requiring interventional radiological procedures
South Western Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee
150 participants
Aug 11, 2021
Interventional
Conditions
Summary
Procedures performed in interventional radiology are often quick and minimally invasive, however some procedures traditionally require increased pain relief and sedation than local anaesthetic alone. For these procedures, we have previously used intravenous medications (midazolam and fentanyl) for sedation and pain relief; however, dosing of these medications is controlled by your nurse or doctor which can lead to under or over dosing of medications, or delayed pain relief due to delays in administration of medication. We believe that letting the patient control how much medication and how often can be effective.
Eligibility
Plain Language Summary
Simplified for easier understanding
This is a simplified summary. Always discuss eligibility with your doctor before enrolling in a clinical trial.
Interested in this trial?
Get notified about updates and connect with the research team.
Interventions
Prospective randomised double arm study comparing methoxyflurane vs intravenous fentanyl and midazolam for patients requiring periprocedural analgesia or sedation. Penthrox® (1 ampule of 3ml methoxyflurane administered via the “green whistle”) plus local anaesthetic. Patients will be educated on safe use of the “green whistle” and be able to use it for the duration of the procedure.
Locations(1)
View Full Details on ANZCTR
For the most up-to-date information, visit the official listing.
ACTRN12623001127695