RecruitingACTRN12623001248651

Just Say No to the Just in Case Cannula: An Implementation Science Trial

Implementing Best Practice for Peripheral Intravenous Cannula in Australian Emergency Departments: A Stepped-wedge Cluster Controlled Trial and Health Economic Analysis


Sponsor

Monash University

Enrollment

108,000 participants

Start Date

Apr 1, 2024

Study Type

Interventional

Conditions

Summary

Background This implementation science trial aims to reduce unnecessary and improve peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) insertion in Emergency Department (ED) patients. The intervention is effective locally and recommended by ACSQHC PIVC Clinical Care Standard. This project has received $2.9M funding from the MRFF 2023-2028. Primary Objective To implement best practice for PIVC in Australian ED. Methods 1. Stepped-wedge cluster-controlled trial for clinical effectiveness and safety of the intervention. We will study 9 diverse EDs and implement a package of interventions, three at a time, with 6-monthly steps. We will measure rates of PIVC insertion, use, safety and PIVC-related infections. 2. An adaptive, co-designed intervention based on our previous model/ACSQHC standards, using validated implementation and evaluation frameworks.


Eligibility

Sex: Both males and femalesMin Age: 18 Yearss

Plain Language Summary

Simplified for easier understanding

This study is tackling a common but avoidable problem in emergency departments: the routine insertion of IV cannulas ('drips') into patients who don't actually need them. Inserting an IV line 'just in case' has become a widespread habit, but it carries real risks — including infection, blood clots, and patient discomfort — and adds costs. Australian safety guidelines already recommend against unnecessary IV placement, but old habits are hard to break. This large, multi-site implementation trial is rolling out a package of best-practice changes across nine diverse emergency departments across Australia. The goal is to reduce unnecessary cannula insertions and only place them when patients genuinely need IV access. The trial uses a 'stepped wedge' design, meaning hospitals adopt the new practices in stages over time, allowing researchers to measure the real-world impact. The study involves adult patients (18 and over) presenting to participating emergency departments. Individual patient data is collected to measure rates of IV insertion, usage, complications, and infection. This trial has received $2.9 million in government funding and is designed to produce evidence that can change practice across Australian hospitals.

This is a simplified summary. Always discuss eligibility with your doctor before enrolling in a clinical trial.

Interested in this trial?

Get notified about updates and connect with the research team.

Interventions

The site-specific quality improvement intervention will be based upon our previous research and the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care (ACSQHC) standard but co-designed by Emer

The site-specific quality improvement intervention will be based upon our previous research and the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care (ACSQHC) standard but co-designed by Emergency Department (ED) managers, clinicians and implementation scientists using validated implementation frameworks. It will be developed using human factors principles, such as equipment, environment and changing clinician heuristics rather than determining the care of individual patients. Each ED site will co-design locally tailored intervention over a two-to-six-month period. Focus groups and working group meetings will occur until consensus regarding site specific interventions has been reached. Elements of the interventions will include: 1. Clinical guidelines review on the best practice for peripheral intravenous cannula (PIVC): based on ACSQHC PIVC quality indicators and locally approved guidelines. 2. Education for healthcare workers, including • Revision of PIVC education at each site • Monthly education sessions at each site • Work with ED medical directors and nurse unit managers to encourage the best practice of PIVC • Reminders at daily clinical staff briefing • Provision of instructions to clinical staff on how to document PIVC in the Electric Medical Record (EMR) • Information to assist clinical staff to make informed decisions 3. Audit and feedback program, such as • Spot audits • Provision of PIVC documentation statistics to ED medical directors and nurse unit managers • Creation of a PIVC dashboard at each site 4. Clinical and leadership champions: to support, advocate for, and spearhead the implementation initiative at each site. 5. Environment and equipment change, such as • Audit of the intravenous (IV) trolley • Equipment changes of IV trolley Outputs of the co-design intervention will be determined by the principal site investigator and the site working group at each site. Trial design The trial duration is three years and consists of three steps: Step 1, Step 2 and Step 3. Routinely collected clinical and health services data will be collected from participating EDs for the duration of the trial. The nine participating ED sites are divided across three clusters, with three sites in each cluster. Each cluster will be allocated to receive the intervention at one of three study steps. This means that one cluster will receive the intervention at Step 1, another cluster will receive the intervention at Step 2, and the final cluster will receive the intervention at Step 3. The nine participating ED hospitals are 1. Monash Medical Centre (Monash Health) 2. Casey Hospital (Monash Health) 3. Dandenong Hospital (Monash Health) 4. Alfred Hospital (Alfred Health) 5. Sandringham Hospital (Alfred Health) 6. Box Hill Hospital (Eastern Health) 7. Gold Coast University Hospital (Queensland Health) 8. Robina Hospital (Queensland Health) 9. Royal Hobart Hospital (Tasmania Health)


Locations(1)

QLD,TAS,VIC, Australia

View Full Details on ANZCTR

For the most up-to-date information, visit the official listing.

Visit

ACTRN12623001248651