Monolithic Zirconia Full-Mouth Implant Supported Rehabilitation Behavior
Implantology Institute
90 participants
Jan 1, 2014
OBSERVATIONAL
Conditions
Summary
In patients that did a full mouth implant supported rehabilitation does Cad/Cam Monolithic Zirconia compared to Cad/Cam Zirconia Suprastructure (zirconium oxide (Yttrium - partially stabilized with tetragonal polycrystalline structure) veneered with feldspathic ceramic, has less post-insertion complications after at least 1-Year follow-up ?
Eligibility
Inclusion Criteria5
- Maxilla and/or Mandible Implant full-mouth restoration
- Monolithic ceramic or zirconia-feldspathic restoration
- be at least 18 years of age;
- present no systemic or local absolute contraindications for endosseous implant placement;
- at least 1 Year Follow-up
Exclusion Criteria2
- the presence of any systemic disease or condition that could compromise postoperative healing or osseointegration.
- Not full mouth rehabilitation
Interested in this trial?
Get notified about updates and connect with the research team.
Interventions
Place dental implants in both jaws (maxilla and mandible) according to manufacturer specifications
rehabilitation with monolithic zirconia implant-prosthesis with bucal feldspathic veneer
restore dental implants with a zirconia suprastructure and feldspathic veneers
Full contour full arch zirconia rehabilitation
Locations(1)
View Full Details on ClinicalTrials.gov
For the most up-to-date information, visit the official listing.
NCT01974362