Non-invasive Ventilation Versus High Flow Oxygen
Non-invasive Ventilation Versus High Flow Oxygen Through Nasal Cannula in Pneumonia Associated Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure
Niguarda Hospital
128 participants
Nov 1, 2017
INTERVENTIONAL
Conditions
Summary
The purpose of the study is to compare the efficacy of alternating Non Invasive Ventilation NIV and High Flow Oxygen HFO compared to High Flow Oxygen HFO alone on gas exchanges and prognosis in pneumonia-associated acute hypoxemic respiratory failure
Eligibility
Plain Language Summary
Simplified for easier understanding
This summary was AI-generated to explain the trial in plain language. It is not medical advice. Always discuss eligibility with your doctor before enrolling in a clinical trial.
Interested in this trial?
Get notified about updates and connect with the research team.
Interventions
High Flow Oxygen nasal cannula
In this arm, participants receive noninvasive ventilation through an interface (such as full face mask or oro-nasal mask) alternated with continuous high flow oxygen though humidified nasal cannula
Locations(1)
View Full Details on ClinicalTrials.gov
For the most up-to-date information, visit the official listing.
NCT03758508