RecruitingNot ApplicableNCT04332783

Isolating and Mitigating Sequentially Dependent Perceptual Errors in Clinical Visual Search


Sponsor

University of California, Berkeley

Enrollment

10,120 participants

Start Date

Apr 1, 2019

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Conditions

Summary

Remote-store-and-forward teledermatology has recently grown exponentially in popularity and use as an efficient, accurate, and cost-effective way to improve the health and well-being of countless patients. Despite advances in machine learning and computer vision, the screening and reading of dermatological images still depends on the visual system of human observers (e.g., clinicians), who receive extensive training to best recognize lesions and anomalies. In remote store-and-forward teledermatology settings, clinicians may examine hundreds of images on a daily basis, seeing several images one after the other. A main underlying assumption of their work is that clinician percepts and decisions about a current image are completely independent from prior viewings. However, we and other groups demonstrated that the visual system has visual serial dependencies (VSDs) at many levels, from perception to decision making, including in clinical tasks. These sequential dependencies, replicated hundreds of times in the literature, mean that what was seen in the past influences (and captures) what is seen and reported at this moment. Theoretically, VSDs are helpful in an autocorrelated natural world, but they are suboptimal in visual tasks conducted in artificial situations where images are not always related. Importantly, serial dependencies in perceptual processing could thus produce significant errors during diagnostic judgments of dermatological images. Our central hypothesis is that VSD can have a disruptive effect in asynchronous remote-store-and-forward teledermatology judgments that impairs accurate detection and recognition of lesions. This hypothesis is supported by our robust pilot data, which show that VSD strongly biases lesion classification in both untrained observers and expert clinicians. The rationale for the proposed research projects is that once it is known how serial dependence arises and how it impacts judgments, we can understand how to control for it. Hence, accuracy of lesion detection and diagnosis can significantly improve. The specific objectives of this proposal are to establish (Aim 1), identify (Aim 2) and mitigate (Aim 3) the impact of VSD on remote-store-and-forward dermatological judgments.


Eligibility

Min Age: 18 Years

Plain Language Summary

Simplified for easier understanding

This study examines a specific type of human error that occurs when doctors or radiologists look at medical images: sequential perceptual errors. This is when finding one abnormality on a scan makes it less likely that a second abnormality will be noticed — a well-documented but poorly understood failure mode in visual diagnosis. Understanding why this happens could lead to better training or system designs that reduce diagnostic mistakes. Participants — typically medical students or clinicians — are asked to identify abnormalities in medical images under controlled conditions. Their eye movements and accuracy are tracked to map out the pattern of errors. You may be eligible if: - You are 18 years of age or older - You have normal or corrected-to-normal vision You may NOT be eligible if: - You are blind or have uncorrectable vision loss Talk to your doctor to see if this trial is right for you.

This summary was AI-generated to explain the trial in plain language. It is not medical advice. Always discuss eligibility with your doctor before enrolling in a clinical trial.

Interested in this trial?

Get notified about updates and connect with the research team.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALpsychophysics of sequential biases (no drug or patient work)

Psychophysical experiment on sequential effects in medical image perception. Observers, including clinicians, perform psychophysical continuous report match-to-sample and forced-choice discrimination judgments of medical images. Observer discrimination accuracy is measured on a trial-wise basis and sequential effects in those judgments are measured. Images can be presented with different interstimulus intervals and in different spatial locations and in different orders. Accuracy, and other signal detection metrics are computed as a function of these factors.


Locations(1)

University of California, Berkeley

Berkeley, California, United States

View Full Details on ClinicalTrials.gov

For the most up-to-date information, visit the official listing.

Visit

NCT04332783


Related Trials