Anatomic TSA vs RTSA for Glenohumeral Arthritis
Anatomic Versus Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Primary Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis. A Randomized Prospective Study
La Tour Hospital
296 participants
Sep 1, 2020
INTERVENTIONAL
Conditions
Summary
There are no published prospective studies that compared 2-year functional outcomes of RTSA and anatomic TSA for the treatment of primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis with intact rotator cuffs and no excessive glenoid retroversion. The primary goal of our prospective randomized study is to determine whether RTSA have at least as good results as anatomic TSA (non-inferiority), in patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis, without rotator cuff tears nor significant glenoid retroversion.
Eligibility
Plain Language Summary
Simplified for easier understanding
This summary was AI-generated to explain the trial in plain language. It is not medical advice. Always discuss eligibility with your doctor before enrolling in a clinical trial.
Interested in this trial?
Get notified about updates and connect with the research team.
Interventions
A prosthesis (either anatomic or reverse) will be implanted in shoulders patients that suffer from primary glenohumeral arthritis.
Locations(1)
View Full Details on ClinicalTrials.gov
For the most up-to-date information, visit the official listing.
NCT04629391