Video Laryngoscopy Versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Nasotracheal Intubation
Video Laryngoscopy Versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Nasotracheal Intubation in Neonates and Infants With Congenital Heart Disease Less Than 1-year of Age Prior Cardiac Surgery: a Pilot Study
Medical University of Vienna
180 participants
Sep 21, 2022
INTERVENTIONAL
Conditions
Summary
The aim of this study is to perform a pilot study investigating the first attempt intubation success rate differing between video laryngoscope nasotracheal intubation and direct laryngoscope nasotracheal intubation. The study population will consist of 60 neonates and infants with congenital heart disease less than 1 year of age who need nasotracheal intubation during general anesthesia for cardiac procedures. Standard nasotracheal intubation will be performed using either a video laryngoscope or direct laryngoscopy. Neonates and infants will be randomly assigned (1:1) to standard video laryngoscopy (with one of the following systems: Storz C-MAC Miller Video Laryngoscope, Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany or Mc Grath Video Laryngoscope, Medtronic, Boulder,USA) or to direct laryngoscopy with one of the following blades: Miller or Macintosh (Heine, Hersching, Germany).
Eligibility
Inclusion Criteria4
- Age less than 1 year
- Congenital heart disease
- Scheduled for cardiac surgery
- Planned postoperative ICU stay
Exclusion Criteria2
- Nostrils not suitable for nasotracheal intubation
- Bleeding during dilation of nostrils
Interested in this trial?
Get notified about updates and connect with the research team.
Interventions
laryngoscopy for nasotracheal intubation
Locations(1)
View Full Details on ClinicalTrials.gov
For the most up-to-date information, visit the official listing.
NCT05902013