Factors Influencing the Results of Treatment in Patients With Hernias of Various Localizations
Factors Affecting the Results of Treatment of Patients With Hernias of Various Localization: Evaluation of Treatment Results Using an Automated Hernia Register
Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University
4,000 participants
Jan 9, 2020
OBSERVATIONAL
Conditions
Summary
The study attempts to quantify the relative risks for acute postoperative pain, complications rate, chronic postoperative pain (CPIP) and recurrence rate after different methods of repair of groin, umbilical and incisional hernia depending on surgical technique, mesh type and fixation suture material. For this purpose the investigators will analyze data from the Kalinigrad Hernia Registry (KHR).
Eligibility
Plain Language Summary
Simplified for easier understanding
This summary was AI-generated to explain the trial in plain language. It is not medical advice. Always discuss eligibility with your doctor before enrolling in a clinical trial.
Interested in this trial?
Get notified about updates and connect with the research team.
Interventions
A groin and femoral hernia non-mesh repair. An umbilical hernia non-mesh repair. A ventral and incisional hernia non-mesh repair.
A groin and femoral hernia repair, reinforced by synthetic mesh. The mesh is affixed with sutures for Lichtenstein. Self-fixating mesh is also possible. An umbilical, ventral, incisional hernia repair, reinforced by synthetic mesh. The mesh is affixed with sutures.
A groin and femoral minimal invasive hernia repair (TAPP, eTEP). The mesh is affixed with tack/no-fixation. Self-fixation mesh is also possible. An umbilical, ventral, incisional minimal invasive hernia repair (eTEP, IPOM,). The mesh is affixed with tack and no-fixation .
Locations(1)
View Full Details on ClinicalTrials.gov
For the most up-to-date information, visit the official listing.
NCT05920200