Traditional Ferguson Hemorrhoidectomy vs Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy
A Randomized Prospective Clinical Trial Comparing the Surgical Outcomes of Traditional Ferguson Hemorrhoidectomy Versus Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy With Anoplasty for Patients With Grade III/IV Hemorrhoids
National Taiwan University Hospital
200 participants
Aug 17, 2022
INTERVENTIONAL
Conditions
Summary
This study aimed to compare the short- and long-term outcomes of stapled hemorrhoidopexy (the procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids, PPH) with anoplasty versus traditional Ferguson method for the treatment of patients with grade III /IV hemorrhoids.
Eligibility
Plain Language Summary
Simplified for easier understanding
This summary was AI-generated to explain the trial in plain language. It is not medical advice. Always discuss eligibility with your doctor before enrolling in a clinical trial.
Interested in this trial?
Get notified about updates and connect with the research team.
Interventions
The patients who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria in this group will undergo Stapled hemorrhoidopexy with anoplasty.
Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy
Locations(1)
View Full Details on ClinicalTrials.gov
For the most up-to-date information, visit the official listing.
NCT05959577