ESP Versus PIFB for Analgesia in Open Cardiac Surgery: a Randomized Control Trial
Comparison of Erector Spiane Plan Block (ESPB) Versus Pecto-intercostal Fascial Block(PIFB) for Analgesia and Respiratory Function Recovery in Cardiac Surgery: a Randomized Control Trial
Taichung Veterans General Hospital
80 participants
Nov 8, 2024
INTERVENTIONAL
Conditions
Summary
This clinical trial compares analgesia efficiency and recovery outcomes between two different fascial plane block techniques (ESPB vs.PIFB) in cardiac surgery patients participant population/health conditions\]. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does ESPB provide superior analgesia than PIFB * Do patients who receive ESPB have better recovery outcomes
Eligibility
Inclusion Criteria1
- Adults patients, elective and first-time cardiac surgery patients undergoing traditional sternotomy. Procedures include coronary artery bypass surgery, valve repair or replacement surgery, atrial and ventricular septal defect repair surgery, and other open-heart surgeries.
Exclusion Criteria1
- \. Emergency surgery 2. Anticipated combined major aortic vascular surgery 3. Already admitted to the ICU or on a ventilator before surgery.
Interested in this trial?
Get notified about updates and connect with the research team.
Interventions
Bilateral ESP: 0.5% ropivacaine 0.3 ml per kg (ideal body weight) each side, 30 min before skin excision. After surgery, use pump to deliver an intermittent automatic bolus of 0.3 ml per kg 0.16% ropivacaine every 4 hours each side.
Bilateral PIFB: 0.5% ropivacaine 0.3 ml per kg (ideal body weight) each side, 30 min before skin excision. After surgery, use pump to deliver an intermittent automatic bolus of 0.3 ml per kg 0.16% ropivacaine every 4 hours each side.
Locations(1)
View Full Details on ClinicalTrials.gov
For the most up-to-date information, visit the official listing.
NCT06322810