RecruitingNot ApplicableNCT06386757

Comparison Between Nasal and Oropharyngeal Bleeding in Video Laryngoscopy and Direct Laryngoscopy for Nasal Intubation

Comparison Between Nasal and Oropharyngeal Bleeding in Video Laryngoscopy and Direct Laryngoscopy for Nasal Intubation in Maxillofacial Trauma Patients: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Sponsor

Aswan University

Enrollment

64 participants

Start Date

Jun 1, 2024

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Conditions

Nasal Bleeding Intubation Complication Maxillofacial Injuries

Summary

The objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for nasal intubation in patients with maxillofacial fractures regarding less bleeding to oral and nasal structures, quicker intubation times, increased success rates for first intubation attempts, fewer uses of the Magill forceps and the less need for cervical spine extension

Eligibility

Min Age: 18 YearsMax Age: 70 Years

Plain Language Summary

Simplified for easier understanding

This clinical trial is studying a procedure called Combined Direct Laryngoscopy (DL) and Bougie and a procedure called Combined Video Laryngoscopy (VL) and Bougie for people with intubation complication, maxillofacial injuries, and other related conditions. The study is currently recruiting participants at 1 location. People eligible for this study include aged 18 Years to 70 Years.

This summary was AI-generated to explain the trial in plain language. It is not medical advice. Always discuss eligibility with your doctor before enrolling in a clinical trial.

Interested in this trial?

Get notified about updates and connect with the research team.