Long-term Reoperations After Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Surgery
Long-term Frequency of Reoperations After Micro-decompression Alone Versus Decompression and Instrumented Fusion in Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
University Hospital of North Norway
794 participants
Sep 19, 2007
OBSERVATIONAL
Conditions
Summary
Severe and persisting pain and disability due to a degenerative narrowing of the spinal canal, lumbar spinal stenosis, can be operated with a simple surgical decompression. Sometimes, there is also a slippage of vertebra, degenerative spondylolisthesis. In such cases, instrumental stabilization (e.g. screws and rods) has been recommended. Even though additional fusion is more complex and riskier, and evidence in high-quality Scandinavian studies shows that it is unnecessary, decompression plus fusion is still the treatment of choice in the USA and most European countries. This reluctance to change clinical practice is mainly due to concerns about long-term results, especially higher reoperation rates among patients operated with decompression only. This register-based non-inferiority study aims to assess long-term reoperations among those treated with and without additional fusion surgery.
Eligibility
Plain Language Summary
Simplified for easier understanding
This summary was AI-generated to explain the trial in plain language. It is not medical advice. Always discuss eligibility with your doctor before enrolling in a clinical trial.
Interested in this trial?
Get notified about updates and connect with the research team.
Interventions
In surgical treatment of Degenerative Spondylolisthesis patients are operated on with a midline-preserving decompression without fusion
In surgical treatment of Degenerative Spondylolisthesis patients are operated on with a decompression followed by an instrumental fusion with or without an additional cage
Locations(1)
View Full Details on ClinicalTrials.gov
For the most up-to-date information, visit the official listing.
NCT06407063