RecruitingPhase 4NCT06438081
Comparison Between Propess and Cook Double-balloon Catheter for Cervical Priming
Comparison Between Propess (Dinoprostone Controlled Release Pessary) and Cook Double-balloon Catheter for Cervical Priming: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Sponsor
The University of Hong Kong
Enrollment
28 participants
Start Date
Jun 1, 2024
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Conditions
Summary
The investigators aimed to compare efficacy and safety of Propess versus Cooks double-balloon catheter for cervical ripening with an unfavorable cervix in term pregnancy.
Eligibility
Sex: FEMALEMin Age: 18 YearsMax Age: 50 Years
Inclusion Criteria5
- Viable singleton pregnancy
- Cephalic presentation
- Bishop score \<7
- At term (\>=37+0 weeks of gestation)
- Nulliparous women
Exclusion Criteria14
- Gestation \<37weeks
- Multiple pregnancy
- Bishop score \<7
- Malpresentation
- Contraindication to vaginal delivery
- Previous Caesarean section
- History of myomectomy
- Maternal fever
- Suspected infection
- Abnormal fetal heart-rate patterns
- Rupture of membranes
- Intrauterine growth restriction
- Not fit for giving consent
- Allergic to Propess or PGE2
Interested in this trial?
Get notified about updates and connect with the research team.
Interventions
COMBINATION_PRODUCTCook double-balloon catheter
To compare whether Cook double-balloon catheter or Propess able to achieve vaginal delivery with a shorter priming to delivery interval
Locations(1)
View Full Details on ClinicalTrials.gov
For the most up-to-date information, visit the official listing.
NCT06438081