Comparison Between Propess and Cook Double-balloon Catheter for Cervical Priming
Comparison Between Propess (Dinoprostone Controlled Release Pessary) and Cook Double-balloon Catheter for Cervical Priming: a Randomized Controlled Trial
The University of Hong Kong
28 participants
Jun 1, 2024
INTERVENTIONAL
Conditions
Summary
The investigators aimed to compare efficacy and safety of Propess versus Cooks double-balloon catheter for cervical ripening with an unfavorable cervix in term pregnancy.
Eligibility
Plain Language Summary
Simplified for easier understanding
This summary was AI-generated to explain the trial in plain language. It is not medical advice. Always discuss eligibility with your doctor before enrolling in a clinical trial.
Interested in this trial?
Get notified about updates and connect with the research team.
Interventions
To compare whether Cook double-balloon catheter or Propess able to achieve vaginal delivery with a shorter priming to delivery interval
Locations(1)
View Full Details on ClinicalTrials.gov
For the most up-to-date information, visit the official listing.
NCT06438081