Mechanical Alignment vs Kalipered Kinematic Alignment Total Knee Arthroplasty
A Prospective, Randomized, Single-blinded Clinical Trial Comparing Mechanical Alignment vs Kalipered Kinematic Alignment Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Medacta Spherika
Northwestern University
95 participants
Aug 1, 2024
INTERVENTIONAL
Conditions
Summary
Knee replacement surgery can be performed in one of two ways. Traditionally the goal was for the new joint to be in a neutral position with respect to the femur (thigh bone). This is called Mechanical Alignment (MA). The neutral position is different than the human knee's natural position, so MA often requires the surgeon to make additional cuts to the ligaments and other soft tissue around the knee. More recently surgeons have started to place the new joint in a position that more closely replicates the natural alignment of the human knee. This is called Kinemetic Alignment (KA). KA can be done without additional soft tissue dissection but the procedure requires a higher level of precision that can be difficult to achieve in every case. Some studies have found no difference in outcomes between MA and KA, whereas others have found KA to be superior. But these were small studies or studies that did not consider patient-rated outcomes.
Eligibility
Plain Language Summary
Simplified for easier understanding
This summary was AI-generated to explain the trial in plain language. It is not medical advice. Always discuss eligibility with your doctor before enrolling in a clinical trial.
Interested in this trial?
Get notified about updates and connect with the research team.
Interventions
Primary TKA with the Medacta SpheriKA, utilizing either MA methodology.
Primary TKA with the Medacta SpheriKA, utilizing either KA methodology.
Locations(1)
View Full Details on ClinicalTrials.gov
For the most up-to-date information, visit the official listing.
NCT06617871