Desarda Tissue Technique vs Lichtenstein Technique for Primary Inguinal Hernia Repair
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Desarda Tissue Technique With the Lichtenstein Technique in Primary Inguinal Hernia Repair
Consorci Sanitari de l'Alt Penedès i Garraf
478 participants
Mar 26, 2025
INTERVENTIONAL
Conditions
Summary
This study aims to evaluate whether a surgical technique (Desarda) is superior to the commonly used surgical technique (Lichtenstein) in inguinal hernia repair concerning the occurrence of postoperative complications. The Lichtenstein technique involves the use of a mesh, while the Desarda technique does not.
Eligibility
Inclusion Criteria4
- Diagnosed with primary inguinal hernia.
- Body mass index below 31
- Indication for inguinal hernia repair via anterior approach, either as outpatient surgery (CMA) or elective admission.
- Legal capacity to provide informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria6
- Patients with a weak, thin, or divided external oblique aponeurosis.
- Participants diagnosed with any of the following conditions:
- Ongoing oncological disease
- Cirrhotic patients classified as Child B or higher
- Women who have previously undergone a cesarean section
- Cognitive or affective conditions that limit the ability to cooperate with the study procedures
Interested in this trial?
Get notified about updates and connect with the research team.
Interventions
This technique prevent from using a mesh to surgical repair of a inguinal hernia
This technique implies using a mesh to surgical repair of a inguinal hernia
Locations(1)
View Full Details on ClinicalTrials.gov
For the most up-to-date information, visit the official listing.
NCT06650878