Narrow Excision Versus Wide Excision for the Treatment of Adults With Invasive Cutaneous Melanoma, ICEMAN Trial
ICEMAN (Intelligent Choice of Excision Margin): A Randomized Controlled Trial of Narrow Excision Versus Wide Excision for Adults With Primary Invasive Cutaneous Melanomas
OHSU Knight Cancer Institute
1,000 participants
Dec 11, 2024
INTERVENTIONAL
Conditions
Summary
This clinical trial compares the effect of a narrow surgical excision (removal) to a wide excision for the treatment of adults with invasive cutaneous melanoma. Currently the standard of care is to take wide margins (boarder of healthy tissue surrounding the melanoma) when removing melanoma. Narrow margin excision removes a smaller amount of healthy tissue when surgically removing the melanoma. Narrow margin excision may be effective in removing the melanoma while also reducing surgical complications and improving quality of life for adults with invasive cutaneous melanoma.
Eligibility
Plain Language Summary
Simplified for easier understanding
This summary was AI-generated to explain the trial in plain language. It is not medical advice. Always discuss eligibility with your doctor before enrolling in a clinical trial.
Interested in this trial?
Get notified about updates and connect with the research team.
Interventions
Undergo blood sample collection
Undergo narrow margin excision
Undergo wide margin excision
Ancillary studies
Locations(5)
View Full Details on ClinicalTrials.gov
For the most up-to-date information, visit the official listing.
NCT06673095