Effect of Continuous Adductor Canal Block Versus Continuous Adductor Canal Block With Additional Infiltration Between The Popliteal Artery and Capsule of The Knee (IPACK) After Arthroscopic Knee Surgeries
A Comparative Study Between the Effect of Continuous Adductor Canal Block Versus Continuous Adductor Canal Block With Additional Infiltration Between The Popliteal Artery and Capsule of The Knee (IPACK) After Arthroscopic Knee Surgeries
Ain Shams University
70 participants
Jan 30, 2025
INTERVENTIONAL
Conditions
Summary
This study aims to evaluate the effect of Continuous Adductor Canal Block only versus adding posterior knee block, known as the Infiltration between the Popliteal Artery and Capsule of the Knee (IPACK) block with Continuous Adductor Canal Block (CACB) after arthroscopic knee surgeries.
Eligibility
Inclusion Criteria5
- Age from 21 to 65 years.
- Both sexes.
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Class I to II.
- Patients with successful spinal anesthesia.
- Patients scheduled for elective arthroscopic knee surgery for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) repair.
Exclusion Criteria9
- Declining to give written informed consent.
- History of allergy to the medications used in the study.
- Contraindications to regional anesthesia (including coagulopathy and local infection).
- Polytrauma patients having lower limb fractures.
- Patients with pre-existing myopathy or neuropathy on the operating limb.
- Patients with diabetes mellitus.
- Psychiatric disorder.
- Morbid obesity \[body mass index (BMI) \> 45kg/m2\].
- Complicated Surgery.
Interventions
Patients will receive continuous adductor canal block.
Patients will receive Continuous Adductor Canal Block with additional Infiltration between The Popliteal Artery and Capsule of The Knee
Locations(1)
View Full Details on ClinicalTrials.gov
For the most up-to-date information, visit the official listing.
NCT06802419