Carbon Footprint Assessment for Robotic, Laparoscopic and Open Colorectal Operations to Enhance Environmental Sustainability
Life Cylce Assessment (LCA) for Different Minimal Invasive Surgical Techniques: A Comparison of Robotic vs . Laparoscopic vs Open Colorectal Operation and Identification of Most Effective Carbon Foot Print Reduction Targets.
University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
30 participants
Mar 19, 2025
OBSERVATIONAL
Conditions
Summary
The goal of this study is to conduct a life cycle assessment of robotic, laparoscopic and open colorectal procedures and compare their climate impact. Further the investigators want to identify major targets for possible reduction in the CO2 footprint in colorectal procedures. The main questions are: Researchers will identify used and prepared materials and instruments for the individual procedures and weigh them individually. SimaPro databases will help calculate the carbon footprints for the used instruments. Additionally, energy waste will be measured and carbon footprint of anesthesia will be estimated with previous existing data from other studies.
Eligibility
Plain Language Summary
Simplified for easier understanding
This summary was AI-generated to explain the trial in plain language. It is not medical advice. Always discuss eligibility with your doctor before enrolling in a clinical trial.
Interested in this trial?
Get notified about updates and connect with the research team.
Interventions
any colorectal procedure planed robot-assisted
any colorectal procedure planed laparoscopically
any colorectal procedure planed open
Locations(2)
View Full Details on ClinicalTrials.gov
For the most up-to-date information, visit the official listing.
NCT06844604