Uterine Round Ligament Preservation Vs Resection in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair in Women：A Multicenter,Stratified Randomized Controlled Trial
Comparative Study on the Effect of Uterine Round Ligament Preservation Vs Resection in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair in Women： a Multicenter,Stratified Randomized Controlled Trial
Nanchong Central Hospital
466 participants
Sep 20, 2024
INTERVENTIONAL
Conditions
Summary
This study aims to compare the clinical effects of uterine round ligament preservation versus resection in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in women.The primary outcomes included Time required for patient surgery.The secondary outcomes included Inguinal hernia recurrence,quality of life assessment,Indicators of postoperative recovery,, et al.
Eligibility
Inclusion Criteria3
- ►Age : Female patients over 18 years of age without a childbearing requirement
- Diagnosis and basis : Female patients diagnosed with Unilateral inguinal hernia.
- agreed to participate in this study and signed the informed consent form.
Exclusion Criteria3
- ►Combined with severe heart, liver, kidney and other diseases.
- pregnant or lactating women.
- those with surgical contraindications.
Interested in this trial?
Get notified about updates and connect with the research team.
Interventions
Both groups underwent laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. The preservation group retained the uterine round ligament, while the resection group had it removed.
Locations(1)
View Full Details on ClinicalTrials.gov
For the most up-to-date information, visit the official listing.
NCT06885788