Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between All-Inside and Complete Tibial Tunnel Techniques in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Among Patients With ACL Ruptures
Indonesia University
40 participants
Oct 15, 2024
INTERVENTIONAL
Summary
This study aims to compare the functional outcomes of patients with ACL rupture following ACL reconstruction surgery using hamstring grafts, between the all-inside technique and the complete tibial tunnel technique. The hamstring graft, which serves as the tissue substitute for the damaged ACL, is harvested from the posterior thigh of the patient and used to replace the torn ligament during reconstruction
Eligibility
Inclusion Criteria2
- Patients with anterior cruciate ligament rupture
- Patients within the age range of 18 to 65 years
Exclusion Criteria4
- Patients with Multiple Ligament Injuries in the Knee Joint
- Patients with a pregnancy condition
- Patients with Severe Osteochondral Defect (ICRS 4)
- Patients with signs of inflamation in knee joint
Interested in this trial?
Get notified about updates and connect with the research team.
Interventions
All-inside ACL reconstruction technique avoids creating full-length bone tunnels. Instead, it uses retrograde drilling to form bone sockets, and the graft is secured with adjustable-loop suspensory fixation on both the femur and tibia.
Complete Tibial Tunnel Technique is a conventional technique for ACL reconstruction which involves the creation of full-length bone tunnels in the tibia for graft passage via an anterograde approach. Graft fixation is typically achieved using a bio-interference screw on the tibial side and a fixed-loop suspensory device on the femoral side
Locations(2)
View Full Details on ClinicalTrials.gov
For the most up-to-date information, visit the official listing.
NCT07023653