NoSeal Trial: Comparing Sealants Versus No Sealant for Preventing CSF Leak After Endonasal Skull Base Surgery
The NoSeal Trial - Nasal Outcome Study Evaluating Artificial Leak-Sealing: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Single-Blinded, Single-Center Clinical Trial Comparing Fibrin Glue (Tisseel®) and a Two-Component Synthetic Polymer Sealant (PEI/PEG, Adherus®) Versus No Sealant for the Prevention of Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak and Promotion of Wound Healing Following Endonasal Skull Base Surgery, Designed in Accordance With the SPIRIT 2025 Guidelines
Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology
225 participants
Aug 15, 2025
INTERVENTIONAL
Conditions
Summary
Postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak is a significant complication of endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEA) to the skull base. The use of tissue sealants such as fibrin glue (Tisseel) or synthetic agents (PEI/PEG) is widespread in surgical practice, however, recent high-quality evidence challenges their clinical benefit and cost-effectiveness. This study aims to investigate whether the routine use of sealants in patient with peri-operatively assessed low CSF leak risk, significantly improves outcomes over no sealant use, to guide more cost- effective, evidence-based closure strategies. To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first randomized clinical trial to evaluate the necessity and comparative effectiveness of fibrin and synthetic sealants versus no sealant in preventing postoperative CSF leaks following endoscopic endonasal surgery in low-post operative CSF leak risk patients.
Eligibility
Inclusion Criteria5
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Scheduled for endoscopic endonasal surgery involving standard skull base reconstruction
- Informed written consent obtained prior to enrollment
- Hemodynamic and electrolyte stability before surgery
- Procedure expected to be completed without use of high-flow intraoperative CSF diversion techniques
Exclusion Criteria9
- Revision surgery or extended endoscopic approaches requiring complex reconstruction (e.g., clival or cribriform defects)
- Tumors requiring complex sella reconstruction from the start
- Preoperative hydrocephalus
- Known allergy to fibrin-based or synthetic sealant components
- Active sinus infection or systemic inflammatory disease
- Prior radiotherapy to the sellar or parasellar region
- Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (HbA1c \> 7.0%)
- Participation in another interventional trial that may influence wound healing or CSF assessment
- Radiologic signs of chronic intracranial hypertension or hypotension
Interventions
Patients will undergo standard skull base reconstruction using mucosal flap repositioning and absorbable hemostatics (e.g., Surgicel®, TachoSil®), without application of any fibrin or synthetic sealant. This serves as the control group for comparison with sealant-assisted closures.
Following standard multilayer closure, patients in this group will receive topical application of a fibrin-based biological sealant (Tisseel®). The intervention aims to assess its effectiveness in preventing postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak and promoting mucosal healing after endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery.
After standard multilayer closure, a synthetic two-component sealant (Adherus®, composed of polyethylene glycol and polyethylenimine) will be applied to reinforce the reconstruction site. This group is used to evaluate the efficacy and safety of synthetic sealant in preventing CSF leaks and supporting wound healing.
Locations(1)
View Full Details on ClinicalTrials.gov
For the most up-to-date information, visit the official listing.
NCT07216157