Leaf Expander Versus Hyrax Expander in Mixed Dentition Patients With Posterior Crossbite.
Evaluation of the Effects of the Leaf Expander Versus Hyrax Expander in Mixed Dentition Patients With Posterior Crossbite: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Cairo University
30 participants
Oct 1, 2025
INTERVENTIONAL
Conditions
Summary
Design: Two-arm parallel randomized clinical trial in mixed dentition (6-12 years). Arms: (1) 9 mm, 900 g leaf expander; (2) 9 mm Hyrax expander. Follow-up: From appliance insertion → completion of intended expansion → 6-month retention. Primary outcome: Pain perception during the first 7 days post-insertion (daily patient-reported scale). Secondary outcomes: Skeletal and dental changes on CBCT.
Eligibility
Inclusion Criteria6
- Male and female patients
- Mixed dentition stage
- Unilateral or bilateral posterior crossbite.
- Patients in prepubertal stage with cervical vertebral maturation stage 1-3.
- Fully erupted maxillary and mandibular permanent first molars.
- Skeletal class I or II.
Exclusion Criteria6
- Previous orthodontic treatment.
- Missing teeth.
- Inadequate oral hygiene.
- Patients with bad oral habits.
- Patients with medical conditions.
- Patients with cleft lip and palate.
Interested in this trial?
Get notified about updates and connect with the research team.
Interventions
The Leaf expander incorporates Nickel Titanium springs that will not require the patients' home activation
Hyrax expander incorporates a screw that requires the patients' home activation
Locations(1)
View Full Details on ClinicalTrials.gov
For the most up-to-date information, visit the official listing.
NCT07301918