RecruitingNot ApplicableNCT07445386

Transdiscal vs Paravertebral Neurolytic Splanchnic Nerve Block for Upper Abdominal Cancer Pain

Comparison of Transdiscal and Paravertebral Approaches for Neurolytic Splanchnic Nerve Block in the Treatment of Upper Abdominal Cancer Pain


Sponsor

Ankara Etlik City Hospital

Enrollment

56 participants

Start Date

Feb 16, 2026

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Conditions

Summary

This study aims to compare the efficacy of fluoroscopy-guided paravertebral (PV) and transdiscal (TD) approaches for splanchnic nerve neurolysis in patients with upper abdominal cancer-related pain (e.g., gastric, pancreatic, and hepatic malignancies). Treatment response will be assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), and the impact of both techniques on quality of life will be evaluated with the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire.


Eligibility

Min Age: 18 Years

Inclusion Criteria2

  • Severe abdominal pain (NRS \> 6) due to upper intra-abdominal organ malignancies (such as gastric, pancreatic, or hepatic cancer).
  • Failure of pain control with conservative treatment modalities.

Exclusion Criteria5

  • Presence of local anatomical variations
  • Localized or systemic infection involving the procedural site
  • Pregnancy
  • Coagulopathy
  • Presence of unstable psychiatric disorders

Interventions

PROCEDUREtransdiscal splanchnic neurolysis

With the patient in the prone position, the T11-T12 vertebral levels were identified under anteroposterior fluoroscopic guidance, and the C-arm was adjusted to align the superior and inferior endplates of the T11-T12 intervertebral disc. The fluoroscope was then rotated obliquely to position the tip of the T12 superior articular process at the midpoint of the T11 vertebral body. After local anesthesia with 2 mL of 1% lidocaine, a spinal needle was advanced to the target point. The ideal final needle position was at the center of the intervertebral disc on the anteroposterior view and at the anterior border of the vertebral body on the lateral view. Correct needle placement was confirmed fluoroscopically, followed by injection of 1-2 mL of nonionic contrast to verify appropriate retrocrural spread. After a successful test dose with 10 mL of 1% lidocaine resulting in \>50% pain relief, 10 mL of 96% alcohol was slowly injected for neurolysis.

PROCEDUREparavertebral splanchnic neurolysis

Under C-arm fluoroscopic guidance, the inferior border of the T11 vertebral body was used as a reference, and the fluoroscope was adjusted to a 15-20° craniocaudal and approximately 15-20° oblique angle. The needle entry point was selected slightly inferior to the T11 transverse process, and after local anesthesia with 2 mL of 1% lidocaine, the spinal needle was advanced along the lateral aspect of the vertebral body. On lateral fluoroscopic view, the needle tip was positioned at the anterior two-thirds of the vertebral body. Correct needle placement was confirmed fluoroscopically, followed by negative aspiration and injection of 1-2 mL of nonionic contrast to verify appropriate retrocrural spread. After a successful test dose with 5 mL of 1% lidocaine resulting in \>50% pain relief, 5 mL of 96% alcohol was slowly injected for neurolysis. The same procedure was repeated contralaterally, resulting in a total of 10 mL of 96% alcohol.


Locations(1)

Ankara Etlik City Hospital

Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)

View Full Details on ClinicalTrials.gov

For the most up-to-date information, visit the official listing.

Visit

NCT07445386


Related Trials