LLLLT vs Piezocision in Accelerating Orthodontic Canine Retraction
Effectiveness of Piezocision Versus Low-level Laser Therapy During Orthodontic Canine Retraction: A Comparative Controlled Clinical Study
Hesham Nabil Ali Al-Qamhawy
21 participants
Apr 1, 2026
INTERVENTIONAL
Conditions
Summary
This comparative controlled clinical study aims to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of piezocision and low-level laser therapy (LLLT) as adjunctive interventions to accelerate orthodontic canine retraction. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: piezocision, LLLT, or a control group (no adjunctive procedure). The study will assess the impact of these interventions on the rate of tooth movement, the type of tooth movement, and patient experience.
Eligibility
Plain Language Summary
Simplified for easier understanding
This summary was AI-generated to explain the trial in plain language. It is not medical advice. Always discuss eligibility with your doctor before enrolling in a clinical trial.
Interested in this trial?
Get notified about updates and connect with the research team.
Interventions
On both right and left sides, LLLT will be performed at the beginning of canine retraction, after 3, 7, 14 days, and then every 14 days for a total four-month period.
On both right and left sides, a minimally invasive flapless piezocision procedure will be performed each month from the beginning of the canine retraction for a total four-month period.
Locations(1)
View Full Details on ClinicalTrials.gov
For the most up-to-date information, visit the official listing.
NCT07466641