Single-Window Versus Two-Window Posterolateral Approach for Malleolar Fractures
Comparison of Single-Window and Two-Window Posterolateral Approaches in Posterior and Lateral Malleolus Fractures: A Clinical Outcomes Analysis
muhammed kılıç
100 participants
Feb 14, 2024
INTERVENTIONAL
Conditions
Summary
The purpose of this prospective clinical trial is to compare the clinical outcomes and early wound complication rates of two different surgical techniques used during the posterolateral approach for ankle fractures. Participants with fractures involving the posterior and lateral malleoli will undergo surgery using either a single-window technique (using a posterior antiglide plate) or a two-window technique (using a lateral anatomic plate). The main question the study aims to answer is whether the single-window approach reduces soft-tissue complications by minimizing surgical dissection, without compromising fracture stability. Patients will be followed for 12 months to assess wound healing, ankle range of motion, implant irritation, and functional recovery.
Eligibility
Plain Language Summary
Simplified for easier understanding
This summary was AI-generated to explain the trial in plain language. It is not medical advice. Always discuss eligibility with your doctor before enrolling in a clinical trial.
Interested in this trial?
Get notified about updates and connect with the research team.
Interventions
Fixation of the fibular fracture utilizing a posterior antiglide plate configuration applied directly to the posterior surface of the fibula.
Fixation of the fibular fracture utilizing a standard lateral anatomic plate configuration applied to the lateral surface of the fibula.
Locations(1)
View Full Details on ClinicalTrials.gov
For the most up-to-date information, visit the official listing.
NCT07481266