Comparison of Awake Tracheal Intubation Methods
A Comparison of Three Difficult Intubation Techniques in Patients With Anticipated Difficult Intubation: A Prospective, Randomized, Parallel-group Clinical Trial
Kocaeli City Hospital
201 participants
Mar 20, 2026
INTERVENTIONAL
Conditions
Summary
The aim of this study was to compare three different awake tracheal intubation technique -fiberoptic bronchoscopy (ATI:FB), videolaryngoscopy (ATI:VL), and fiberoptic bronchoscopy via a supraglottic airway device (ATI:SAD)- in terms of success rates, intubation times, and complications. Additionally, the study aims to evaluate the reliability of the SAD-assisted ATI method and its potential to contribute to the literature.
Eligibility
Plain Language Summary
Simplified for easier understanding
This summary was AI-generated to explain the trial in plain language. It is not medical advice. Always discuss eligibility with your doctor before enrolling in a clinical trial.
Interested in this trial?
Get notified about updates and connect with the research team.
Interventions
awake tracheal intubation will be perform via FOB
Awake tracheal intubation will be perform via videolaryngoscopy
Awake tracheal Intubation will be perform via aintree catheter loaded FOB through supraglottic airway device
Locations(1)
View Full Details on ClinicalTrials.gov
For the most up-to-date information, visit the official listing.
NCT07484841