RecruitingNot ApplicableNCT07511374

A Randomized Controlled Ecological Momentary Intervention to Improve Digital Self-Regulation and Well-Being

Activating Metacognition in Daily Life: A Randomized Controlled Ecological Momentary Intervention to Improve Digital Self-Regulation and Well-Being


Sponsor

The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Enrollment

240 participants

Start Date

Mar 1, 2026

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Conditions

Summary

The primary objective of this study is to examine whether an ecological momentary intervention (EMI), combining behavioral self-monitoring (screen time screenshot uploads) and structured reflection, can enhance metacognitive awareness and metacognitive regulation in the context of recreational screen time among young adults. A secondary objective is to investigate whether improvements in metacognitive processes are associated with subsequent changes in behavioral and psychological outcomes, including recreational screen time (RST), stress, and life satisfaction. Furthermore, this study aims to elucidate the underlying mechanisms through which the intervention exerts its effects by integrating a randomized controlled trial (RCT) design with intensive longitudinal (daily diary) data. Specifically, the study addresses the following research questions: RQ1 (Primary Intervention Effect on Metacognition): Does the EMI lead to higher levels of daily metacognitive awareness and metacognitive regulation (planning, monitoring, and evaluation) compared to the control group? RQ2 (Within-person Associations): At the within-person level, do day-to-day fluctuations in metacognitive awareness and regulation predict same-day and next-day changes in recreational screen time, stress, and life satisfaction? RQ3 (Mediating Mechanism): Do increases in metacognitive awareness and regulation mediate the effects of the EMI on recreational screen time, stress, and life satisfaction? RQ4 (Between-person Effects): At the between-person level, do individuals in the intervention group exhibit higher average levels of metacognitive awareness and regulation, as well as lower recreational screen time and stress and higher life satisfaction, compared to those in the control group?


Eligibility

Min Age: 18 YearsMax Age: 25 Years

Inclusion Criteria7

  • Participants must meet all of the following criteria:
  • Age between 18 and 25 years old.
  • Own and regularly use a smartphone.
  • Report an average daily recreational screen time of at least 3 hours on weekdays or 4 hours on weekends, based on self-report (Zablotsky et al., 2025).
  • Be able to access their device's built-in screen time tracking function (or equivalent system-level usage report) and upload screenshots when required.
  • Be willing and able to complete daily surveys throughout the full study period.
  • Indicate motivation to reduce or regulate their recreational screen use.

Exclusion Criteria6

  • Outside the age range of 18-25 years.
  • Do not own a smartphone or do not use it regularly.
  • Report average daily recreational screen time below 3 hours on weekdays and below 4 hours on weekends.
  • Are unable to access device-based screen time tracking functions or cannot provide valid screenshots when required.
  • Are unwilling or unable to complete daily surveys across the study period (e.g., anticipated non-compliance, scheduling constraints).
  • Do not express motivation to reduce or regulate their recreational screen use.

Interested in this trial?

Get notified about updates and connect with the research team.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALEcological momentary intervention

A composite ecological momentary intervention that integrates behavioral self-monitoring and metacognitive reflection. Specifically, each day participants will: 1. Upload a screenshot of their device-recorded screen time (e.g., iOS Screen Time or Android Digital Wellbeing), serving as a form of behavioral self-monitoring. 2. Complete structured reflection prompts designed to activate metacognitive processes, including reflection on: (1) total recreational screen time, (2) usage contexts (e.g., situations or triggers), (3) awareness of potential overuse, and (4) use of regulation strategies (e.g., planning, monitoring, evaluation).


Locations(1)

The Hong Kong Polythechnic University

Hong Kong, Select An Option…, Hong Kong

View Full Details on ClinicalTrials.gov

For the most up-to-date information, visit the official listing.

Visit

NCT07511374