Poly vs Hybrid Glenoid in Stemless aTSA
A Randomised, Multicentre, Prospective, Non-inferiority Clinical Study Analysing Outcomes of a Cemented Pegged Polyethylene Glenoid Component Versus a Hybrid Polyethylene and Trabecular Titanium Glenoid Component in Patients With Osteoarthritis Treated With an Anatomical SMR Stemless Shoulder Arthroplasty
Spaarne Gasthuis
94 participants
Jun 30, 2025
INTERVENTIONAL
Conditions
Summary
Participants are randomized 1:1 to receive either a cemented all-polyethylene pegged glenoid or a hybrid trabecular titanium-pegged glenoid during anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. Multicentre, stratified block randomization with variable block sizes; patient- and assessor-blinded.
Eligibility
Plain Language Summary
Simplified for easier understanding
This summary was AI-generated to explain the trial in plain language. It is not medical advice. Always discuss eligibility with your doctor before enrolling in a clinical trial.
Interested in this trial?
Get notified about updates and connect with the research team.
Interventions
Stemless anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (SMR system) with a cemented pegged all-polyethylene glenoid (standard fixation concept).
Stemless anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (SMR system) with a hybrid polyethylene glenoid: porous trabecular titanium central peg intended for bone ingrowth plus cemented peripheral pegs.
Locations(1)
View Full Details on ClinicalTrials.gov
For the most up-to-date information, visit the official listing.
NCT07520721