Hybrid Transobturator Tape Versus Conventional Synthetic Tape for Stress Urinary Incontinence
Hybrid Transobturator Tape Versus Conventional Synthetic Tape: A Randomized Controlled Trial Assessing Safety, Efficacy, and Female Sexual Function
Benha University
90 participants
Jul 1, 2026
INTERVENTIONAL
Conditions
Summary
This randomized controlled trial compares the safety, efficacy, and impact on female sexual function of a novel hybrid transobturator tape (combining an autologous rectus fascia strip with a polypropylene mesh) versus standard synthetic transobturator tape in women undergoing surgery for stress urinary incontinence.
Eligibility
Plain Language Summary
Simplified for easier understanding
This summary was AI-generated to explain the trial in plain language. It is not medical advice. Always discuss eligibility with your doctor before enrolling in a clinical trial.
Interested in this trial?
Get notified about updates and connect with the research team.
Interventions
Outside-in transobturator tape procedure utilizing a full synthetic polypropylene tape positioned tension-free under the mid-urethra.
Insertion of a composite graft (autologous rectus fascia strip harvested via a Pfannenstiel incision and sutured between polypropylene tape arms) positioned via the obturator foramen route with the biological tissue directly under the mid-urethra.
Locations(1)
View Full Details on ClinicalTrials.gov
For the most up-to-date information, visit the official listing.
NCT07762300