Comparison of Virtual Reality, EMLA Cream, and Standard Care for Pain During Blood Draws in Children
Comparison of the Efficacy of Virtual Reality and Topical Anesthetic During Venipuncture in Children: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Marie Lulková
450 participants
Sep 1, 2024
INTERVENTIONAL
Conditions
Summary
This randomized controlled trial evaluates methods to reduce pain during venipuncture in children aged 3 to 15 years. The study compares three approaches: virtual reality distraction using a VR headset, topical anesthesia with EMLA cream, and standard care without an additional pain-reducing intervention. The main question is whether virtual reality reduces pain during venipuncture more effectively than EMLA cream or standard care. Pain is assessed immediately after venipuncture using the Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale (0-10). The planned study sample includes 450 children.
Eligibility
Plain Language Summary
Simplified for easier understanding
This summary was AI-generated to explain the trial in plain language. It is not medical advice. Always discuss eligibility with your doctor before enrolling in a clinical trial.
Interested in this trial?
Get notified about updates and connect with the research team.
Interventions
Virtual reality distraction is provided during venipuncture using a Meta Quest 3 headset. All participants assigned to this intervention view the same 360° wildlife video. Children can change the direction of view by moving their head but cannot control the content or sequence of the video. The headset is used throughout the venipuncture procedure.
Topical EMLA cream containing lidocaine and prilocaine is applied to the planned venipuncture site, covered with an occlusive dressing, and left in place for at least 60 minutes before venipuncture.
Locations(1)
View Full Details on ClinicalTrials.gov
For the most up-to-date information, visit the official listing.
NCT07763132