Treatment of personality disorders using a whole of service guidelines-based approach
Treatment of personality disorders using a whole of service guidelines-based approach to improve functioning and reduce hospital use: a delayed randomised controlled trial
University of Wollongong
1,000 participants
Jun 22, 2011
Interventional
Conditions
Summary
Treatment for personality disorder is effective but only specialist long-term approaches have been studied on specific subsets of patients with highly trained staff. This study aims to evaluate a whole of service approach in a large public mental health service. The treatment is guidelines-based approach based on a relationship model (Project Air Strategy for Personality Disorders 2011). A delayed randomised controlled trial compares this approach to standard care.
Eligibility
Plain Language Summary
Simplified for easier understanding
This summary was AI-generated to explain the trial in plain language. It is not medical advice. Always discuss eligibility with your doctor before enrolling in a clinical trial.
Interested in this trial?
Get notified about updates and connect with the research team.
Interventions
Active intervention is a whole of service guidelines-based treatment, derived from a relationship model, and will be compared to treatment as usual (TAU). The approach emphasises good clinical care grounded in developed treatment guidelines (Project Air Strategy for Personality Disorders 2011) derived from the NICE (2009) and Gunderson and Links Clinical Guide for treating people with Personality Disorders (2008). Treatment is a stepped care approach, including specialised individual, group and family interventions delivered by mental health professionals trained in the model, for up to 12 months. Service sections are randomly divided into practice sites receiving the intervention or treatment as usual. After a 12-month delay, planning and implementation for the TAU site will commence. The study has two aims: (1) to assess the impact of the implementation compared to TAU on a service level, using hospital records (primary outcome), and (2) to assess the impact of the implementation on patient outcomes and therapist knowledge and attitudes (secondary outcomes).
Locations(9)
View Full Details on ANZCTR
For the most up-to-date information, visit the official listing.
ACTRN12612000843853