CompletedPhase 4ACTRN12612001006831

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of adapalene versus benzoyl peroxide in the treatment of mild acne vulgaris; a clinical trial

A randomized, double-blind, clinical trial to compare the efficacy (lesion number), side effects, and patient's satisfaction rate of topical adapalene and benzoyl peroxide in the cases with mild acne vulgaris


Sponsor

Dr Shahla Talghini

Enrollment

60 participants

Start Date

Jan 1, 2011

Study Type

Interventional

Conditions

Summary

The present clinical trial aims to compare the efficacy and safety profile of topical adapalene 0.1% and BPO 2.5% gels in patients with mild acne vulgaris. For this purpose, 60 patients equally received either topical adapalene 0.1% gel or topical BPO 2.5% gel once daily to the entire face (except periocular area and lip) for two consecutive months. Three months later, number of lesions, side effects and patients' satisfaction were compared between the two groups.


Eligibility

Sex: Both males and femalesMin Age: 18 YearssMax Age: 40 Yearss

Inclusion Criteria2

  • Diagnosis of acne vulgaris
  • Mild disease according to the Evaluator Global Severity Score (grade 2)

Exclusion Criteria4

  • Severe acne vulgaris
  • Any dermatologic conditions requiring systemic therapy
  • Nursing/pregnant women
  • The women were planning for pregnancy

Interested in this trial?

Get notified about updates and connect with the research team.

Interventions

Patients received topical adapalene 0.1% gel (ADA; Differin; Galderma, Watford, UK) once daily for 8 weeks.

Patients received topical adapalene 0.1% gel (ADA; Differin; Galderma, Watford, UK) once daily for 8 weeks.


Locations(1)

Iran, Islamic Republic Of

View Full Details on ANZCTR

For the most up-to-date information, visit the official listing.

Visit

ACTRN12612001006831


Related Trials