RecruitingNot ApplicableNCT03827187

Awareness Detection and Communication in Disorders of Consciousness

EEG Based Awareness Detection and Communication in Prolonged Disorders of Consciousness and Physical Disability


Sponsor

University of Ulster

Enrollment

30 participants

Start Date

Feb 8, 2022

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Conditions

Summary

STUDY OVERVIEW Brain injury can result in a loss of consciousness or awareness, to varying degrees. Some injuries are mild and cause relatively minor changes in consciousness. However, in severe cases a person can be left in a state where they are "awake" but unaware, which is called unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS, previously known as a vegetative state). Up to 43% of patients with a UWS diagnosis, regain some conscious awareness, and are then reclassified as minimally conscious after further assessment by clinical experts. Many of those in the minimally conscious state (MCS) and all with unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS) are incapable of providing any, or consistent, overt motor responses and therefore, in some cases, existing measures of consciousness are not able to provide an accurate assessment. Furthermore, patients with locked-in syndrome (LIS), which is not a disorder of consciousness as patients are wholly aware, also, struggle to produce overt motor responses due to paralysis and anarthria, leading to long delays in accurate diagnoses using current measures to determine levels of consciousness and awareness. There is evidence that LIS patients, and a subset of patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness (DoC), can imagine movement (such as imagining lifting a heavy weight with their right arm) when given instructions presented either auditorily or visually - and the pattern of brain activity that they produce when imagining these movements, can be recorded using a method known as electroencephalography (or EEG). With these findings, the investigators have gathered evidence that EEG-based bedside detection of conscious awareness is possible using Brain- Computer Interface (BCI) technology - whereby a computer programme translates information from the users EEG-recorded patterns of activity, to computer commands that allow the user to interact via a user interface. The BCI system for the current study employs three possible imagined movement combinations for a two-class movement classification; left- vs right-arm, right-arm vs feet, and left-arm vs feet. Participants are trained, using real-time feedback on their performance, to use one of these combinations of imagined movement to respond to 'yes' or 'no' answer questions in the Q\&A sessions, by imagining one movement for 'yes' and the other for 'no'. A single combination of movements is chosen for each participant at the outset, and this participant-specific combination is used throughout their sessions. The study comprises three phases. The assessment Phase I (sessions 1-2) is to determine if the patient can imagine movements and produce detectable modulation in sensorimotor rhythms and thus is responding to instructions. Phase II (sessions 3-6) involves motor-imagery (MI) -BCI training with neurofeedback to facilitate learning of brain activity modulation; Phase III (sessions 7-10) assesses patients' MI-BCI response to closed questions, categorized to assess biographical, numerical, logical, and situational awareness. The present study augments the evidence of the efficacy for EEG-based BCI technology as an objective movement-independent diagnostic tool for the assessment of, and distinction between, PDoC and LIS patients.


Eligibility

Min Age: 10 YearsMax Age: 80 Years

Inclusion Criteria4

  • Study 1 - Initial assessment/screening
  • Disorder of consciousness or low awareness state diagnosis ranging from unclear diagnosis in low awareness states, vegetative state and minimally conscious diagnosis. Those with locked in syndrome / completed locked in syndrome resulting from injury or disease e.g., motor neuron disease who do not have health problems that would preclude them from participating may be assessed but considered as a separate cohort to those with low awareness states.
  • acute, post-acute patients where appropriate
  • \- Those identified in study 1 to have a level of awareness based on observed appropriate brain activations and/or those who have known awareness but are target groups for movement independent assistive devices and technologies controlled using a brain-computer interface.

Exclusion Criteria6

  • Participants with brain related diseases or illnesses (e.g., progressive neurological condition or uncontrolled epilepsy) or suffer from pain (these may adversely affect the brain data produced) and are deemed to be unsuitable for the trials by clinical teams.
  • Current consumption of medications that cause excessive fatigue or adversely affect cognitive functioning
  • Where English is not the individual's first language
  • Participant with excessive uncontrollable arm or head movement or teeth grinding as EEG signal quality will be degraded significantly.
  • Study 2 - BCI training
  • \- Participants who have shown no active brain responses in study 1 where the difference between baseline

Interested in this trial?

Get notified about updates and connect with the research team.

Interventions

OTHERMotor imagery based EEG-BCI

Information gathered in this study may be useful when considering diagnosis of prolonged disorder of consciousness and successful adoption of device could lead to assistive communication intervention with therapeutic benefits. Participants undergo quick assessment to test ability to engage in task, if successful this implies they are minimally conscious, have some awareness of self and memory intact to remember commands. During training participant undergoes multiple sessions whereby they are conducting two different imagined movements to move a sound across the azimuthal plane in a direction dictated by an auditory cue. Participant will receive auditory feedback on the position of the sound which acts as a reflection of how well the participant is engaged in the task in terms of performance and consistency across trials. The participant will move on to use the imagined movements to answer a series of biographical, situational, basic logic and numbers/letters questions.


Locations(18)

National Rehabilitation Hospital of Ireland

Dublin, Ireland

Castel Froma Neuro Care

Warwick, Warwickshire, United Kingdom

Northern Health and Social Care Trust

Antrim, United Kingdom

Barnsley Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

Barnsley, United Kingdom

Belfast Health and Social Care Trust

Belfast, United Kingdom

Frenchay Brain Injury Rehabilitation Centre

Bristol, United Kingdom

NHS Lothian

Edinburgh, United Kingdom

Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust

Hull, United Kingdom

The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust

Liverpool, United Kingdom

The Huntercombe Group

London, United Kingdom

Royal Hospital for Neuro-Disability

London, United Kingdom

Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust

London, United Kingdom

Western Health and Social Care Trust

Londonderry, United Kingdom

Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Oxford, United Kingdom

Southern Health and Social Care Trust

Portadown, United Kingdom

Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Sheffield, United Kingdom

South Warwickshire NHS Foundation Trust

Warwick, United Kingdom

Inspire Neurocare Worcester

Worcester, United Kingdom

View Full Details on ClinicalTrials.gov

For the most up-to-date information, visit the official listing.

Visit

NCT03827187


Related Trials