Modulation Therapy for Locally Advanced NPC Based on Plasma EBV DNA Level Post-ICT
Response-adapted Modulation Therapy for Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Based on Circulating Epstein-Barr Virus DNA Level Post Induction Chemotherapy
Fudan University
198 participants
Jul 2, 2022
INTERVENTIONAL
Conditions
Summary
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma is biologically different from traditional head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. The mainstay treatment for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma is cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiation. Recent phase III randomized control trials have demonstrated that induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiation further improved progression-free survival. However, not every patient has good response to induction chemotherapy. Evidence has accumulated that those with poor response to induction chemotherapy, or those with detectable Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) DNA post induction chemotherapy, correlated with poorer progression-free survival. Huang CL et al. (Int J Radiat Oncol Bio Phys. 2019) reported that plasma EBV DNA load at completion of induction chemotherapy was an independent and earlier predictor for progression-free survival and overall survival in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Lv J et al. (Nat Commun. 2019) demonstrated that real-time monitoring of plasma EBV DNA response added prognostic information, and had the potential uitility for risk-adapted treatment intensification in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Therefore, investigators selects those with poor plasma EBV DNA response during and after induction chemotherapy, and intensifies the treatment with combination of anti-PD-1 antibody, in order to improve progression-free survival in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma, according to response-adapted strategy.
Eligibility
Plain Language Summary
Simplified for easier understanding
This summary was AI-generated to explain the trial in plain language. It is not medical advice. Always discuss eligibility with your doctor before enrolling in a clinical trial.
Interested in this trial?
Get notified about updates and connect with the research team.
Interventions
Early Responders: They receive the second and third cycle of induction chemotherapy (GP regimen), followed by cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiation. Intermediate Responders: they received the second and third cycle of induction chemotherapy (GP regimen) with combination of toripalimap (240mg d1, q3w \* 2 cycles), followed by cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiation. Late responders: they received the second and third cycle of induction chemotherapy (GP regimen) with combination of toripalimap (240mg d1, q3w \* 2 cycles), followed by cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiation. At 4-6 weeks post-chemoradiation, they received adjuvant capecitabine and toripalimab for 6 months.
Induction chemotherapy (GP regimen) and cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiation. GP regimen: Gemcitabine 1.0 g d1,d8, cisplatin 25mg/m2 d1-3 q3w Cisplatin based chemotherapy: cisplatin 80mg/m2 given in three consecutive days, q3w \* 2 cycles.
Locations(1)
View Full Details on ClinicalTrials.gov
For the most up-to-date information, visit the official listing.
NCT05628922