Comparison of MBR + Suture Tape, MBR, and Anatomic Reconstruction for CLAI in GJL Cases: A Prospective Cohort Study
Comparison of Modified Broström Repair + Suture Tape and Anatomic Reconstruction for CLAI in Chronic Lateral Ankle Instability in Generalized Joint Laxity Cases: A Prospective Cohort Study
Peking University Third Hospital
114 participants
Nov 1, 2021
OBSERVATIONAL
Conditions
Summary
GJL is a risk factor for postoperative recurrent instability following an MBR for CLAI. BPR with suture tape augmentation and anatomic reconstruction may provide more strength and stability. However, BPR with suture tape augmentation may lead to rejection of the suture tape, while anatomic reconstruction may be associated with more trauma. In addition, the outcomes between the BPR with suture tape augmentation and anatomic reconstruction were unknown.
Eligibility
Inclusion Criteria1
- Clinical diagnosis of lateral ankle pain and instability Beighton score ≥4 Age with 18 to 60 years
Exclusion Criteria1
- Patients with an acute or subacute ankle injury (within 3 months) Injury of the deltoid ligament Alignment of lower extremity greater than 5 degrees Fractures of the lower extremity Stage III or IV osteoarthritis Patients who refused to participate in the study
Interested in this trial?
Get notified about updates and connect with the research team.
Interventions
Patients with CLAI and GJL will accept the Modified Broström + Suture tape augmentation operation
Anatomic reconstruction operation
Open Modified Broström-Gould surgery
Locations(1)
View Full Details on ClinicalTrials.gov
For the most up-to-date information, visit the official listing.
NCT05698446