Vertical Soft Tissue Augmentation With CTG vs ADM
Vertical Soft Tissue Augmentation With Dermal Matrix and Enamel Matrix Derivative vs Connective Tissue Graft for the Treatment of Peri-implant Soft Tissue Dehiscences in the Esthetic Zone: A Randomized, Controlled, Clinical, Trial
Harvard Medical School (HMS and HSDM)
28 participants
May 26, 2023
INTERVENTIONAL
Conditions
Summary
The study aims at comparing two different approaches for vertical soft tissue augmentation at implant sites exhibiting soft tissue dehiscences: autogenous connective tissue graft vs acellular dermal matrix + enamel matrix derivative
Eligibility
Plain Language Summary
Simplified for easier understanding
This summary was AI-generated to explain the trial in plain language. It is not medical advice. Always discuss eligibility with your doctor before enrolling in a clinical trial.
Interested in this trial?
Get notified about updates and connect with the research team.
Interventions
Vertical soft tissue augmentation with autogenous connective tissue graft (CTG)
Vertical soft tissue augmentation with acellular dermal matrix (ADM) and enamel matrix derivative (EMD)
Locations(1)
View Full Details on ClinicalTrials.gov
For the most up-to-date information, visit the official listing.
NCT05729607