RecruitingNot ApplicableNCT05899933

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Two Different Surgical Therapeutic Protocols of Peri-implantitis

Implantoplasty Versus Implant Decontamination With Erythritol Air-abrasive Device During Surgical Therapy of Peri-implantitis. Clinical, Radiographic and Microbiological Evaluation. A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study


Sponsor

National and Kapodistrian University of Athens

Enrollment

45 participants

Start Date

Jul 28, 2023

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Conditions

Summary

The purpose of the present study is to compare the 1-year clinical, radiographic and microbiological outcomes and patients' satisfaction following surgical treatment of peri-implantitis after applying two different surface modification methods. Secondarily, analysis and comparison of the microbiological results of implants diagnosed and treated for peri-implantitis with healthy implants will be performed.


Eligibility

Min Age: 18 YearsMax Age: 80 Years

Inclusion Criteria9

  • Participants ≥ 18 years and ≤ 80 years of age
  • Non-smokers based on the patients' self-reported smoking status, defined as patients who had never smoked or had quit smoking at least 2 years ago
  • Implants in function for more than 1 year after suprastructure connection
  • Presence of at least one implant diagnosed with peri-implantitis defined as presence of bleeding on probing and/or suppuration, probing pocket depth ≥6 mm and ≥3 mm of detectable bone loss after initial re-modelling
  • Absence of implant mobility
  • in participants with more than one implant, the implant with the worst clinical condition will be studied.
  • Absence of peri-implant signs of inflammation (redness, swelling)
  • Lack of bleeding on probing
  • Absence of bone loss beyond crestal bone level changes resulting from initial remodeling, which should not be ≥2 mm

Exclusion Criteria8

  • Smokers
  • Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (HBA1c >7)
  • Treatment with bisphosphonates
  • Needing antibiotic prophylaxis
  • Currently pregnant or breast-feeding women
  • History of systemic administration of antibiotic treatment during the preceding 3 months
  • Systemic conditions that contraindicate treatment
  • Use of medications known to induce gingival hyperplasia

Interested in this trial?

Get notified about updates and connect with the research team.

Interventions

PROCEDURENon-surgical peri-implant therapy

2 weeks after baseline examination, non surgical therapy will be applied in implants diagnosed with peri-implantitis prior to enrollment in surgical therapy. Firstly, participants will be instructed in oral hygiene. Professional supragingival and subgingival debridement of implants/ teeth, including the selected for the study implants, will be performed. Local anesthesia will be performed, when needed. Targeted implants will be treated with PEEK-coating ultrasonic tips (Instrument PI; EMS), titanium curettes (IMPM11/12T, IMPM13/14T; Hu-Friedy), rubber cup and polishing paste. Possible adjustments to implant-borne prostheses will be considered, whenever possible. Re-evaluation of non-surgical therapy will be performed after 6 weeks. At the 6-week reevaluation, participants with peri-implant probing pocket depth ≥5 mm and bleeding on probing and/or suppuration in patients with full mouth plaque score ≤20% will proceed to surgical therapy.

PROCEDUREImplantoplasty

Screw-retained supraconstructions and, when possible, cement-retained restorations will be removed. Following local anesthesia, intrasulcular incisions will be performed and full-thickness flaps will be elevated on the buccal and lingual aspects of affected implants. Granulation tissue will be removed, and titanium-coated curettes (IMPM11/12T, IMPM13/14T; Hu-Friedy) and NiTi brushes (NEGRIN IN DENTAL) will be applied to remove hard deposits on implants. Osseous recontouring will be performed when indicated followed by irrigations with saline. Implantoplasty will be applied using tungsten carbide burs of various shapes and sizes (Peri-implantitis Kit; Meisinger) followed by irrigations with saline. Flaps will be readjusted and closed with sutures in order to allow a non-submerged healing. Supraconstructions will be reconnected after the surgery.

PROCEDUREErythritol Air-abrasive device

Screw-retained supraconstructions and, when possible, cement-retained restorations will be removed. Following local anesthesia, intrasulcular incisions will be performed and full-thickness flaps will be elevated on the buccal and lingual aspects of affected implants. Granulation tissue will be removed, and titanium-coated curettes (IMPM11/12T, IMPM13/14T; Hu-Friedy), and NiTi brushes (NEGRIN IN DENTAL) will be applied to remove hard deposits on implants. Osseous recontouring will be performed when indicated followed by irrigations with saline. Implant surface decontamination with an air-abrasive device (AIRFLOW® MAX, AIRFLOW® Prophylaxis Master; EMS) with erythritol powder (AIRFLOW® Plus Powder; EMS) will be applied followed by irrigations with saline. Flaps will be readjusted and closed with sutures in order to allow a non-submerged healing. Supraconstructions will be reconnected after the surgery.

PROCEDUREProphylaxis

Supramucosal biofilm removal of implants/ teeth will be performed at, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after surgical therapy for the Implantoplasty group and the Erythritol Air-abrasive device group and at 2 weeks, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after baseline examination for the control group. Targeted implants will be treated with an air-abrasive device (AIRFLOW® MAX, AIRFLOW® Prophylaxis Master; EMS) with erythritol powder (AIRFLOW® Plus Powder; EMS). During these appointments, patients will be re-motivated and re-instructed to oral-hygiene measures.


Locations(1)

Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens

Athens, Greece

View Full Details on ClinicalTrials.gov

For the most up-to-date information, visit the official listing.

Visit

NCT05899933


Related Trials