VA vs DA for Newly Diagnosed Hig-risk AML
Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Venetoclax Plus Azacytidine Versus Daunorubicin Plus Cytarabine in Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Patients With Adverse Risk Features
The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University
116 participants
Apr 1, 2024
INTERVENTIONAL
Conditions
Summary
This is an open-label, multicenter, phase 2b, randomized study aiming to compare the efficacy and safety of venetoclax plus azacytidine Versus daunorubicin plus cytarabine (conventional 7+3 regimen) in adult acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients with adverse risk featuress. Participants will be 1:1 randomly assigned to the VA and DA groups. Once remission was achieved, consolidated chemotherapy will be performed and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is strongly recommended. After completion of the study intervention, participants will be followed-up every 1 to 2 months for up to 2 years.
Eligibility
Plain Language Summary
Simplified for easier understanding
This summary was AI-generated to explain the trial in plain language. It is not medical advice. Always discuss eligibility with your doctor before enrolling in a clinical trial.
Interested in this trial?
Get notified about updates and connect with the research team.
Interventions
VA regimen: azacytidine, 75mg/m2, subcutaneously, on days 1-7; venetoclax, orally, once a day, 100mg, d1; 200mg, d2; 400mg, days 3-28.
DA regimen: daunorubicin (60mg/m2) on days 1-3, intraveneously injection, and cytarabine (100mg/m2) on days 1-7, intraveneously injection, for 1 cycle.
Locations(2)
View Full Details on ClinicalTrials.gov
For the most up-to-date information, visit the official listing.
NCT05939180